public inbox for gdb-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom de Vries <vries@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-cvs@sourceware.org
Subject: [binutils-gdb] [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.opt/solib-intra-step.exp for powerpc64le
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 13:23:37 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221128132337.6D0543858C62@sourceware.org> (raw)

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=76cd77dc729b03d6b33c683323594479e33a3f9a

commit 76cd77dc729b03d6b33c683323594479e33a3f9a
Author: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
Date:   Mon Nov 28 14:23:34 2022 +0100

    [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.opt/solib-intra-step.exp for powerpc64le
    
    On powerpc64le-linux, I run into:
    ...
    (gdb) PASS: gdb.opt/solib-intra-step.exp: first-hit
    step^M
    28      { /* first-retry */^M
    (gdb) FAIL: gdb.opt/solib-intra-step.exp: second-hit
    ...
    
    It's a bit easier to understand what happens if we do a full stepping session:
    ...
    Temporary breakpoint 1, main ()
        at solib-intra-step-main.c:23
    23        shlib_first ();
    (gdb) step
    shlib_first () at solib-intra-step-lib.c:29
    29        shlib_second (0); /* first-hit */
    (gdb) step
    28      { /* first-retry */
    (gdb) step
    29        shlib_second (0); /* first-hit */
    (gdb) step
    shlib_second (dummy=0)
        at solib-intra-step-lib.c:23
    23        abort (); /* second-hit */
    ...
    and compare that to the line info:
    ...
    CU: solib-intra-step-lib.c:
    File name                    Line number    Starting address    View    Stmt
    solib-intra-step-lib.c                22               0x710               x
    solib-intra-step-lib.c                23               0x724               x
    solib-intra-step-lib.c                28               0x740               x
    solib-intra-step-lib.c                29               0x74c               x
    solib-intra-step-lib.c                28               0x750               x
    solib-intra-step-lib.c                29               0x758               x
    solib-intra-step-lib.c                30               0x760               x
    solib-intra-step-lib.c                 -               0x77c
    ...
    
    So we step from line 29 to line 28, and back to line 29, which is behaviour
    that matches the line table.  The peculiar order is due to using optimization.
    The problem is that the test-case doesn't expect this order.
    
    Fix this by allowing this order in the test-case.
    
    Tested on powerpc64le-linux.
    
    PR testsuite/29792
    Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29792

Diff:
---
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/solib-intra-step.exp | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/solib-intra-step.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/solib-intra-step.exp
index 0acda6594c5..e803a7db14d 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/solib-intra-step.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/solib-intra-step.exp
@@ -58,16 +58,35 @@ gdb_test_multiple "step" $test {
     }
 }
 
+set in_second 0
 set test "second-hit"
 gdb_test_multiple "step" $test {
+    -re -wrap " first-retry .*" {
+	if { $in_second } {
+	    fail $gdb_test_name
+	} else {
+	    send_gdb "step\n"
+	    exp_continue
+	}
+    }
+    -re -wrap " first-hit .*" {
+	if { $in_second } {
+	    fail $gdb_test_name
+	} else {
+	    send_gdb "step\n"
+	    exp_continue
+	}
+    }
     -re -wrap " second-hit .*" {
 	pass $gdb_test_name
     }
     -re -wrap " second-retry .*" {
+	set in_second 1
 	send_gdb "step\n"
 	exp_continue
     }
     -re -wrap "get_pc_thunk.*" {
+	set in_second 1
 	send_gdb "step\n"
 	exp_continue
     }

                 reply	other threads:[~2022-11-28 13:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221128132337.6D0543858C62@sourceware.org \
    --to=vries@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-cvs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).