[binutils-gdb] [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.threads/multiple-successive-infcall.exp on native-gdbserver

[Tom de Vries <vries@sourceware.org>]

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f2be4eeb6ce93e4dfab259587bcaf5cb861fc25b

commit f2be4eeb6ce93e4dfab259587bcaf5cb861fc25b
Author: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
Date:   Thu Mar 9 12:56:27 2023 +0100

    [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.threads/multiple-successive-infcall.exp on native-gdbserver
    
    With test-case gdb.threads/multiple-successive-infcall.exp and target board
    native-gdbserver I run into:
    ...
    (gdb) continue^M
    Continuing.^M
    [New Thread 758.759]^M
    ^M
    Thread 1 "multiple-succes" hit Breakpoint 2, main () at \
      multiple-successive-infcall.c:97^M
    97            thread_ids[tid] = tid + 2; /* prethreadcreationmarker */^M
    (gdb) FAIL: gdb.threads/multiple-successive-infcall.exp: thread=5: \
      created new thread
    ...
    
    The problem is that the new thread message doesn't match the regexp, which
    expects something like this instead:
    ...
    [New Thread 0x7ffff746e700 (LWP 570)]^M
    ...
    
    Fix this by accepting this form of new thread message.
    
    Tested on x86_64-linux.

Diff:
---
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/multiple-successive-infcall.exp | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/multiple-successive-infcall.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/multiple-successive-infcall.exp
index f33cba62855..bd037a02674 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/multiple-successive-infcall.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/multiple-successive-infcall.exp
@@ -40,6 +40,9 @@ foreach_with_prefix thread {5 4 3}  {
     -re "\\\[New Thread ${hex} \\\(LWP \[0-9\]+\\\)\\\].*${gdb_prompt}" {
       pass "${after_new_thread_message}"
     }
+    -re -wrap "\\\[New Thread $decimal\\.$decimal\\\]\r\n.*" {
+      pass $gdb_test_name
+    }
   }
 }