From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 108947 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2015 15:22:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 108931 invoked by uid 89); 22 Apr 2015 15:22:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mailhost.u-strasbg.fr Received: from mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (HELO mailhost.u-strasbg.fr) (130.79.222.217) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:22:18 +0000 Received: from mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antispam (Postfix) with ESMTP id B65E021C98; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:22:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id A749922321; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:22:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lmr.u-strasbg.fr (lmr3.u-strasbg.fr [172.30.21.3]) by mr7.u-strasbg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839F421C98; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:22:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lmr.u-strasbg.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5268FB4; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:22:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from E6510Muller (gw-ics.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.210.225]) (Authenticated sender: mullerp) by lmr3.u-strasbg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0CBD5CB; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:22:09 +0200 (CEST) From: "Pierre Muller" To: "'Joel Brobecker'" , References: <20150422133231.GB4764@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20150422133231.GB4764@adacore.com> Subject: RE: 3 weeks to GDB 7.9.1 release? Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:22:00 -0000 Message-ID: <000e01d07d10$194b7a30$4be26e90$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00826.txt.bz2 Would the patch to gdb/p-exp.y that fixes issue PR 127815 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D17815 be acceptable without the testsuite change? This patch was accepted recently by Doug, and committed to trunk. https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-04/msg00735.html The patch [part 1/3] itself is at: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-02/msg00111.html Or would the application of the three parts of the patch be more acceptable? The two other parts are at: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-02/msg00112.html and https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-02/msg00113.html I would really like to have it in 7.9.1 as it is completely pascal language specific. Pierre Muller as pascal language maintainer > -----Message d'origine----- > De=A0: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches- > owner@sourceware.org] De la part de Joel Brobecker > Envoy=E9=A0: mercredi 22 avril 2015 15:33 > =C0=A0: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Objet=A0: 3 weeks to GDB 7.9.1 release? >=20 > Hello everyone, >=20 > Planned date for 7.9.1 re-spin is Wed May, 13th. It appears that > it's been a fairly smooth sailing for the gdb-7.9-branch since > GDB 7.9 was released... Our release wiki page > (https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/GDB_7.9_Release) shows that only > one issue was fixed, and we only have 1 that has been identified > as blocking: >=20 > [Doug?] PR18066 argument "word" seems broken in Command.complete > (text, word) >=20 > Anything else that should be seen as blocking for 7.9.1? >=20 > This is a good opportunity to remind everyone that patches to > release branches, once the first official release has been made, > must be documented on that page. Otherwise, I will not be able > to provide the full list of improvements that this release brings. > I reviewed the commits on that branch, and identified 2 patches that > have been pushed without following the full procedure, and I will be > emailing those authors privately. But the branch is polluted by > a number of date-update commits, so if you know you've made a change > and forgot to follow the procedure, it's not too late: You need a PR, > which you can create if you don't have one already, and then just add > a one-line description to the wiki page shown above (that description > can simply be the subject line of the PR). >=20 > Thank you, > -- > Joel