From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE59C3858D33 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 18:05:12 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org AE59C3858D33 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark.ca Received: from [10.0.0.11] (unknown [217.28.27.60]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 260581E0D3; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 13:05:12 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1673373912; bh=nSrN8LQ5jalXSeam/rPxJt+NMhpp/j/Nt4cKeb+Yt7A=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=CE/Mq/7JEoyFlPBWxwE5rRzuwLluLOfaqj6braJoeRCKaxJxceKgePq6OV/8WD09A Vh+47sa+z5G5ViXMltVzExsIweV/gp+IbnYQVQLhc2vpZGrPpvTOUbtotJnL43uPIJ NkiGgvWiTbnbSvBO1oYvr5oIErh/37FBpJ7HzPG0= Message-ID: <01243e5b-137f-9ac0-8235-8f51df07902e@simark.ca> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 13:05:11 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1 Subject: Re: [pushed] [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.threads/dlopen-libpthread.exp for upstream glibc Content-Language: en-US To: Tom de Vries , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20221230155407.5917-1-tdevries@suse.de> <7bb6a09d-b915-c855-804d-4c3b13e38b37@simark.ca> <174dba84-bac5-af4c-cd2b-85257f57b025@suse.de> From: Simon Marchi In-Reply-To: <174dba84-bac5-af4c-cd2b-85257f57b025@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: > Attached patch fixes things. > > WDYT? > > Thanks, > - Tom Here: > # We link the exec without -lpthread, but libpthread.so may already be loaded at main > # due to LD_PRELOAD. > set libpthread_maybe_preloaded 0 > set binfile [standard_output_file $executable] > if { [has_dependency $binfile libpthread\\.so] == 1 } { > set libpthread_maybe_preloaded 1 > } Ok, so this works because ldd is influenced by LD_PRELOAD, I didn't know. > > # We link the shlib with -lpthread, but since glibc 2.34 libpthread has been > # merged with libc, so libpthread.so may not be a dependency. > set libpthread_missing 0 > if { [has_dependency $binfile libpthread\\.so] == 0 } { > set libpthread_missing 1 > } The two has_dependency calls use $binfile. Should one of them use $binfile_lib? The second one I think. Simon