From: Ajit Kumar Agarwal <ajit.kumar.agarwal@xilinx.com>
To: Michael Eager <eager@eagercon.com>,
Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
Vinod Kathail <vinodk@xilinx.com>,
Vidhumouli Hunsigida <vidhum@xilinx.com>,
"Nagaraju Mekala" <nmekala@xilinx.com>
Subject: RE: [Patch] Microblaze: Port of Linux gdbserver
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 08:58:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <03105cda11564e60a2ef365cbe36688e@BY2FFO11FD023.protection.gbl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <548F24CA.7090503@eagercon.com>
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Eager [mailto:eager@eagercon.com]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 11:44 PM
To: Pedro Alves; Ajit Kumar Agarwal; Joel Brobecker
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Vinod Kathail; Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala
Subject: Re: [Patch] Microblaze: Port of Linux gdbserver
On 12/15/14 10:02, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 10/17/2014 08:22 PM, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote:
>
>> Gdb.base gdb testsuite is run and here is the status of gdb testsuite run for gdb.base.
>>
>> === gdb Summary ===
>>
>> # of expected passes 7804
>> # of unexpected failures 2263
>
> Over 2000 unexpected failures is not very reassuring though.
> Have you looked at the logs to get an idea of what might be broken?
>>Bare metal test results show ~350 failures. The gdbserver results should be similar.
push_dummy_code feature is not implemented in Microblaze port.
The total failure due to this functionality is 592 in bare metal. Of this gdb.base failures are 357.
May we know what you meant by ~350 failures.
--
Michael Eager eager@eagercon.com
1960 Park Blvd., Palo Alto, CA 94306 650-325-8077
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-18 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-08 13:52 Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-10-09 16:29 ` Michael Eager
2014-10-09 18:54 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-10-09 23:42 ` Michael Eager
2014-10-13 16:00 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-10-13 17:49 ` Michael Eager
2014-10-14 3:03 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-10-14 15:07 ` Michael Eager
2014-10-14 15:33 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-10-14 15:42 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-10-15 13:27 ` Pedro Alves
2014-10-17 19:22 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-12-15 18:02 ` Pedro Alves
2014-12-15 18:13 ` Michael Eager
2014-12-18 8:58 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal [this message]
2014-12-18 16:10 ` Michael Eager
2014-12-18 8:57 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-12-18 11:28 ` Pedro Alves
2014-12-18 16:53 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-12-18 17:40 ` Pedro Alves
2014-12-19 8:27 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-12-19 10:56 ` Pedro Alves
2014-12-19 10:26 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-12-19 11:02 ` Pedro Alves
2014-12-19 18:06 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-11-26 12:13 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-12-15 16:08 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-10-08 14:59 Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-09-10 10:14 [Patch, microblaze]: " Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-09-10 13:31 ` Michael Eager
2014-09-10 13:46 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-09-10 14:23 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-09-10 14:39 ` Michael Eager
2014-09-10 14:59 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-09-10 15:12 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-09-10 15:27 ` Michael Eager
2014-09-10 15:30 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-09-10 15:35 ` Michael Eager
2014-09-10 15:51 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-09-10 14:43 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-09-10 15:04 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-09-10 15:54 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-09-10 16:10 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-09-12 8:01 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-09-12 8:39 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-09-12 15:38 ` Michael Eager
2014-09-16 6:42 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-09-16 12:06 ` Michael Eager
2014-09-17 9:36 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-09-17 14:12 ` Michael Eager
2014-09-16 17:04 ` Pedro Alves
2014-09-17 6:16 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-09-17 8:15 ` Pedro Alves
2014-09-17 8:20 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-09-23 12:49 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-09-30 11:43 ` Pedro Alves
2014-09-30 13:27 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-09-30 13:37 ` Pedro Alves
2014-09-30 14:21 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=03105cda11564e60a2ef365cbe36688e@BY2FFO11FD023.protection.gbl \
--to=ajit.kumar.agarwal@xilinx.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=eager@eagercon.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=nmekala@xilinx.com \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=vidhum@xilinx.com \
--cc=vinodk@xilinx.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).