public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* GDB 10.1 release -- 2020-09-26 Update
@ 2020-09-26 18:35 Joel Brobecker
  2020-09-29 12:14 ` Strasuns, Mihails
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2020-09-26 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches

Hi everyone,

Here is another update on the release. I think we're converging
with maybe one new item which I'm a little worried about, as this
touches an area that is traditionally very complex and delicate
(PR gdb/26642).

Fixed Since the Previous Update:
--------------------------------

  * [TomT] <PR tui/26638>
    TUI focus behavior change
    https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26638

Added Since the Last Update:
----------------------------

  * [SimonM] <PR gdb/26642>
    "maintenance set target-async off" is broken on GNU/Linux
    https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26642

Other Ongoing Items:
--------------------

  * [EliZ] <PR build/26607>
    GDB build failure in gnulib if building on Windows version older than 8
    https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26607

    gnulib pushed a couple of patches:
    https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-September/171920.html

    The proposal is the following:
      - On the branch: we review, and test the two patches, then
        integrate them;
      - On master, we schedule a gnulib update.

    Patch for the branch proposed at:
    https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-September/172155.html

Not Critical, but Requested:
----------------------------

  * [<unassigned>] <PR python/26586> (raised by Christian B)
    from_tty argument to Python's gdb.execute is no longer effective
    https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26586

    Not release blocking because not exactly a regressions (8.2 and 9
    already had the bug).

    Patch pushed to master:

        | commit 8f9929bb97dc0f0fdf60269ac8c9a7d50746646f (origin/master, origin/HEAD)
        | Author: Gareth Rees <grees@undo.io>
        | Date:   Sat Sep 26 11:01:45 2020 -0700
        | Subject: gdb: Fix from_tty argument to gdb.execute in Python.

    Requested second opinion before backporting.

  * [AntonK, ShahabV] (suggested by SimonM)
    Add ARC Linux gdbserver support

    No movement since last update (waiting on path author).

    Patch (Aug 26th):
    https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-August/171499.html

    Latest messages:
    https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-September/171911.html

-- 
Joel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* RE: GDB 10.1 release -- 2020-09-26 Update
  2020-09-26 18:35 GDB 10.1 release -- 2020-09-26 Update Joel Brobecker
@ 2020-09-29 12:14 ` Strasuns, Mihails
  2020-09-29 13:41   ` Simon Marchi
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Strasuns, Mihails @ 2020-09-29 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joel Brobecker, gdb-patches; +Cc: Simon Marchi

Hello,

FYI: I am currently investigating a regression caused by 7188ed02d2a7e3fce00a0214e70457c5ef56df6b (Replace dwarf2_per_cu_data::cu backlink with per-objfile map).
With my program it causes GDB to crash with the following backtrace:

#0  __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:51
#1  0x00007fe4e871c8b1 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79
#2  0x000055e6b5a17333 in handle_sigsegv (sig=11) at /users/mstrasun/sources/gdb/gdb/event-top.c:885
#3  <signal handler called>
#4  0x000055e6b5f08f9e in htab_find_with_hash (htab=0x0, element=0x7ffcd1f58440, hash=3394)
    at /users/mstrasun/sources/gdb/libiberty/hashtab.c:591
#5  0x000055e6b59d0b9b in follow_die_offset (sect_off=(unknown: 3394), offset_in_dwz=0, 
    ref_cu=0x7ffcd1f58528) at /users/mstrasun/sources/gdb/gdb/dwarf2/read.c:22273
#6  0x000055e6b59d0c2e in follow_die_ref (src_die=0x0, attr=0x7ffcd1f58540, ref_cu=0x7ffcd1f58528)
    at /users/mstrasun/sources/gdb/gdb/dwarf2/read.c:22288
#7  0x000055e6b59ac51a in partial_die_full_name (pdi=0x55e6b87f02a0, cu=0x55e6b7811510)
    at /users/mstrasun/sources/gdb/gdb/dwarf2/read.c:8296
#8  0x000055e6b59ac65c in add_partial_symbol (pdi=0x55e6b87f02a0, cu=0x55e6b7811510)
    at /users/mstrasun/sources/gdb/gdb/dwarf2/read.c:8323
#9  0x000055e6b59ad040 in add_partial_subprogram (pdi=0x55e6b87f02a0, lowpc=0x7ffcd1f58760, 
    highpc=0x7ffcd1f58768, set_addrmap=0, cu=0x55e6b7811510)
    at /users/mstrasun/sources/gdb/gdb/dwarf2/read.c:8591
<...>

After this patch die_hash ends up being null in this context.

BR,
Mihails

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gdb-patches <gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org> On Behalf Of
> Joel Brobecker
> Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2020 8:35 PM
> To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Subject: GDB 10.1 release -- 2020-09-26 Update
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> Here is another update on the release. I think we're converging with maybe
> one new item which I'm a little worried about, as this touches an area that is
> traditionally very complex and delicate (PR gdb/26642).
> 
> Fixed Since the Previous Update:
> --------------------------------
> 
>   * [TomT] <PR tui/26638>
>     TUI focus behavior change
>     https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26638
> 
> Added Since the Last Update:
> ----------------------------
> 
>   * [SimonM] <PR gdb/26642>
>     "maintenance set target-async off" is broken on GNU/Linux
>     https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26642
> 
> Other Ongoing Items:
> --------------------
> 
>   * [EliZ] <PR build/26607>
>     GDB build failure in gnulib if building on Windows version older than 8
>     https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26607
> 
>     gnulib pushed a couple of patches:
>     https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-
> September/171920.html
> 
>     The proposal is the following:
>       - On the branch: we review, and test the two patches, then
>         integrate them;
>       - On master, we schedule a gnulib update.
> 
>     Patch for the branch proposed at:
>     https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-
> September/172155.html
> 
> Not Critical, but Requested:
> ----------------------------
> 
>   * [<unassigned>] <PR python/26586> (raised by Christian B)
>     from_tty argument to Python's gdb.execute is no longer effective
>     https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26586
> 
>     Not release blocking because not exactly a regressions (8.2 and 9
>     already had the bug).
> 
>     Patch pushed to master:
> 
>         | commit 8f9929bb97dc0f0fdf60269ac8c9a7d50746646f (origin/master,
> origin/HEAD)
>         | Author: Gareth Rees <grees@undo.io>
>         | Date:   Sat Sep 26 11:01:45 2020 -0700
>         | Subject: gdb: Fix from_tty argument to gdb.execute in Python.
> 
>     Requested second opinion before backporting.
> 
>   * [AntonK, ShahabV] (suggested by SimonM)
>     Add ARC Linux gdbserver support
> 
>     No movement since last update (waiting on path author).
> 
>     Patch (Aug 26th):
>     https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-August/171499.html
> 
>     Latest messages:
>     https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-
> September/171911.html
> 
> --
> Joel
Intel Deutschland GmbH
Registered Address: Am Campeon 10-12, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de
Managing Directors: Christin Eisenschmid, Gary Kershaw
Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau
Registered Office: Munich
Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: GDB 10.1 release -- 2020-09-26 Update
  2020-09-29 12:14 ` Strasuns, Mihails
@ 2020-09-29 13:41   ` Simon Marchi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Simon Marchi @ 2020-09-29 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Strasuns, Mihails, Joel Brobecker, gdb-patches

On 2020-09-29 8:14 a.m., Strasuns, Mihails wrote:
> Hello,
>
> FYI: I am currently investigating a regression caused by 7188ed02d2a7e3fce00a0214e70457c5ef56df6b (Replace dwarf2_per_cu_data::cu backlink with per-objfile map).
> With my program it causes GDB to crash with the following backtrace:
>
> #0  __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:51
> #1  0x00007fe4e871c8b1 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79
> #2  0x000055e6b5a17333 in handle_sigsegv (sig=11) at /users/mstrasun/sources/gdb/gdb/event-top.c:885
> #3  <signal handler called>
> #4  0x000055e6b5f08f9e in htab_find_with_hash (htab=0x0, element=0x7ffcd1f58440, hash=3394)
>     at /users/mstrasun/sources/gdb/libiberty/hashtab.c:591
> #5  0x000055e6b59d0b9b in follow_die_offset (sect_off=(unknown: 3394), offset_in_dwz=0,
>     ref_cu=0x7ffcd1f58528) at /users/mstrasun/sources/gdb/gdb/dwarf2/read.c:22273
> #6  0x000055e6b59d0c2e in follow_die_ref (src_die=0x0, attr=0x7ffcd1f58540, ref_cu=0x7ffcd1f58528)
>     at /users/mstrasun/sources/gdb/gdb/dwarf2/read.c:22288
> #7  0x000055e6b59ac51a in partial_die_full_name (pdi=0x55e6b87f02a0, cu=0x55e6b7811510)
>     at /users/mstrasun/sources/gdb/gdb/dwarf2/read.c:8296
> #8  0x000055e6b59ac65c in add_partial_symbol (pdi=0x55e6b87f02a0, cu=0x55e6b7811510)
>     at /users/mstrasun/sources/gdb/gdb/dwarf2/read.c:8323
> #9  0x000055e6b59ad040 in add_partial_subprogram (pdi=0x55e6b87f02a0, lowpc=0x7ffcd1f58760,
>     highpc=0x7ffcd1f58768, set_addrmap=0, cu=0x55e6b7811510)
>     at /users/mstrasun/sources/gdb/gdb/dwarf2/read.c:8591
> <...>
>
> After this patch die_hash ends up being null in this context.

If you can send a reproducer, I can take a look.

Simon

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-09-29 13:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-09-26 18:35 GDB 10.1 release -- 2020-09-26 Update Joel Brobecker
2020-09-29 12:14 ` Strasuns, Mihails
2020-09-29 13:41   ` Simon Marchi

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).