From: <Paul_Koning@Dell.com>
To: <kevin.pouget@gmail.com>, <khooyp@cs.umd.edu>
Cc: <tromey@redhat.com>, <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>, <dje@google.com>
Subject: RE: Handle SIGINT in Python
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:48:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <09787EF419216C41A903FD14EE5506DD030F1EB37E@AUSX7MCPC103.AMER.DELL.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPftXUJgSPMv7pDntMJh+5-2wR+N54UxG-mPR_csGvwL09DsOQ@mail.gmail.com>
>just my 2 cents to the discussion.
>[I'm not sure I could follow all the arguments, so my comments are based on Khoo's patch]
>
>+static void
>+gdbpy_handle_sigint (int sig)
>+{
>+ PyErr_SetInterrupt ();
>+}
>
>I would be quite afraid if GDB could throw an KeyboardInterruptException in any call to its API, there wouldn't be any way to ensure internal consistency inside the script, except with try_catch surrounding every GDB function call ...
Of course, but that is exactly what you want. In any Python script, if you need to handle interrupts for proper operation, you wrap the critical section in a try..except block. If not, then you don't. There is nothing new or different here in the GDB case. Any Python statement can throw a KeyboardException.
The only difference is in what happens when you get to the top of a Python script with a KeyboardInterrupt exception and no one is catching it. In an interactive session (python shell) you get a backtrace. I think in a Python interactive session inside GDB ("python" command with no arguments) the same should be true. In a script invocation from the command shell (outside GDB) you'd also get a traceback in this case. In GDB, you probably should not, as was discussed earlier; in that case, the interrupt should be passed up to the GDB common machinery to handle exactly as it would handle an interrupt for any other command, without a Python style traceback printout.
paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-12 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-10 21:31 Khoo Yit Phang
2012-01-10 21:47 ` Doug Evans
2012-01-10 22:09 ` Khoo Yit Phang
2012-01-11 20:59 ` Tom Tromey
2012-01-11 21:06 ` Paul_Koning
2012-01-11 21:23 ` Tom Tromey
2012-01-12 0:54 ` Doug Evans
2012-01-12 15:52 ` Kevin Pouget
2012-01-12 16:48 ` Paul_Koning [this message]
2012-01-13 10:55 ` Kevin Pouget
2012-01-13 12:11 ` Paul_Koning
2012-01-10 21:49 ` Tom Tromey
2012-01-11 21:15 ` Tom Tromey
2012-01-11 21:49 ` Khoo Yit Phang
2012-01-11 22:46 ` Khoo Yit Phang
2012-01-20 21:40 ` Tom Tromey
2012-01-22 16:36 ` Khoo Yit Phang
2012-01-22 20:54 ` Khoo Yit Phang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=09787EF419216C41A903FD14EE5506DD030F1EB37E@AUSX7MCPC103.AMER.DELL.COM \
--to=paul_koning@dell.com \
--cc=dje@google.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=kevin.pouget@gmail.com \
--cc=khooyp@cs.umd.edu \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).