From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 83159 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2019 15:19:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 83085 invoked by uid 89); 20 Aug 2019 15:19:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=refactorings, HX-Languages-Length:488 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:19:50 +0000 Received: from mail-wr1-f71.google.com (mail-wr1-f71.google.com [209.85.221.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E557F80F6D for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:19:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-f71.google.com with SMTP id a2so7190461wrs.8 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 08:19:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:8a0:f913:f700:4c97:6d52:2cea:997b? ([2001:8a0:f913:f700:4c97:6d52:2cea:997b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e6sm16898638wrw.35.2019.08.20.08.19.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Aug 2019 08:19:46 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] TUI refactoring round N To: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20190818172735.17477-1-tom@tromey.com> From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <0cbc2e1c-4a8f-44d5-9639-eedf8c0fcd3a@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:19:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190818172735.17477-1-tom@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2019-08/txt/msg00429.txt.bz2 On 8/18/19 6:27 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: > Here's yet another series of TUI refactorings. This series should > have no user-visible changes. There are several more series like this > to come, but as before, they are interspersed with user-visible > patches which I plan to submit separately. > > Each patch was built and tested using gdb.tui on x86-64 Fedora 28. Other than the comment to patch #5, this all looks good to me. Thanks, Pedro Alves