From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 75766 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2016 16:12:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 75750 invoked by uid 89); 12 Oct 2016 16:12:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=reverting X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:12:40 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6AC4C04B928; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:12:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u9CGCcIx030487; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:12:39 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update gnulib to current upstream master To: Yao Qi References: <1476285429-24489-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <0d295a85-e43a-6b6c-aef1-7f61a9ef5704@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:12:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg00322.txt.bz2 On 10/12/2016 05:09 PM, Yao Qi wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: >> I tried building gdb with G++ 4.7 and CXX="g++ -std=gnu+11", and that >> tripped on a build error: > > GDB source requires C++03 compiler, but it should be built with recent > compiler with recent C++ standard. > > Patch is good to me, but let us leave this patch here for one day or two > for the purpose of collecting comments or objections. Related to C++11? That was that motivated the update this time, but we should routinely update gnulib _anyway_. This allows reverting: commit e063da67902e2ba03cfc6f7381694f4c6a72ecf4 Author: Pedro Alves AuthorDate: Tue Nov 17 15:17:45 2015 +0000 [C++] Define __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS / __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS for stdint.h for example, since my gnulib fix has gone into master upstream meanwhile. Thanks, Pedro Alves