public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb/testsuite: allow "require" callbacks to provide a reason
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 17:44:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0e0254fc-5fa8-71b2-01b8-cc5742909727@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230328122305.6108-1-simon.marchi@efficios.com>

On 3/28/23 14:23, Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches wrote:
> When an allow_* proc returns false, it can be a bit difficult what check
> failed exactly, if the procedure does multiple checks.  To make
> investigation easier, I propose to allow the "require" callbacks to be
> able to return a list of two elements: the zero/non-zero value, and a
> reason string.
> 

Hi,

I like the idea.

The only question I had was what the desired behaviour is for:
...
   return {1 "bla"}
...

AFAICT, the current implementation just ignores "bla", and I wondered if 
perhaps we should error out to avoid the impression that something will 
be done with "bla".

That however will make this fail if $res == 1:
...
set res [try_foo]
return {$res "foo"}
...
so probably that's just too restrictive.

LGTM as-is.

Thanks,
- Tom

> Use the new feature in allow_hipcc_tests to demonstrate it (it's also
> where I hit actually hit this inconvenience).  On my computer (where GDB
> is built with amd-dbgapi support but where I don't have a suitable GPU
> target), I get:
> 
>      UNSUPPORTED: gdb.rocm/simple.exp: require failed: allow_hipcc_tests (no suitable amdgpu targets found)
> 
> vs before:
> 
>      UNSUPPORTED: gdb.rocm/simple.exp: require failed: allow_hipcc_tests
> 
> Change-Id: Id1966535b87acfcbe9eac99f49dc1196398c6578
> ---
>   gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp  | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>   gdb/testsuite/lib/rocm.exp |  8 ++++----
>   2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
> index 46aa1441d6d0..7fb4f1cbdab4 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
> @@ -9251,22 +9251,43 @@ gdb_caching_proc have_avx {} {
>   #
>   # ARG can either be a name, or of the form !NAME.
>   #
> -# Each name is a proc to evaluate in the caller's context.  It returns
> -# a boolean, and a "!" means to invert the result.  If this is
> -# nonzero, all is well.  If it is zero, an "untested" is emitted and
> -# this proc causes the caller to return.
> +# Each name is a proc to evaluate in the caller's context.  It can return a
> +# boolean or a two element list with a boolean and a reason string.
> +# A "!" means to invert the result.  If this is true, all is well.  If it is
> +# false, an "unsupported" is emitted and this proc causes the caller to return.
> +#
> +# The reason string is used to provide some context about a require failure,
> +# and is included in the "unsupported" message.
>   
>   proc require { args } {
>       foreach arg $args {
>   	if {[string index $arg 0] == "!"} {
> -	    set ok 0
> +	    set required_val 0
>   	    set fn [string range $arg 1 end]
>   	} else {
> -	    set ok 1
> +	    set required_val 1
>   	    set fn $arg
>   	}
> -	if {$ok != !![uplevel 1 $fn]} {
> -	    unsupported "require failed: $arg"
> +
> +	set result [uplevel 1 $fn]
> +	set len [llength $result]
> +	if { $len == 2 } {
> +	    set actual_val [lindex $result 0]
> +	    set msg [lindex $result 1]
> +	} elseif { $len == 1 } {
> +	    set actual_val $result
> +	    set msg ""
> +	} else {
> +	    error "proc $fn returned a list of unexpected length $len"
> +	}
> +
> +	if {$required_val != !!$actual_val} {
> +	    if { [string length $msg] > 0 } {
> +		unsupported "require failed: $arg ($msg)"
> +	    } else {
> +		unsupported "require failed: $arg"
> +	    }
> +
>   	    return -code return 0
>   	}
>       }
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/lib/rocm.exp b/gdb/testsuite/lib/rocm.exp
> index b3e435339dbc..389d73bcaa5f 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/rocm.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/rocm.exp
> @@ -64,19 +64,19 @@ gdb_caching_proc allow_hipcc_tests {} {
>       # testing against GDBserver, there's no point in running the ROCm
>       # tests.
>       if {[target_info gdb_protocol] != ""} {
> -	return 0
> +	return {0 "remote debugging"}
>       }
>   
>       # Ensure that GDB is built with amd-dbgapi support.
>       set output [remote_exec host $::GDB "$::INTERNAL_GDBFLAGS --configuration"]
>       if { [string first "--with-amd-dbgapi" $output] == -1 } {
> -	return 0
> +	return {0 "amd-dbgapi not supported"}
>       }
>   
>       # Check we have a working hipcc compiler available.
>       set targets [hcc_amdgpu_targets]
>       if { [llength $targets] == 0} {
> -	return 0
> +	return {0 "no suitable amdgpu targets found"}
>       }
>   
>       set flags [list hip additional_flags=--offload-arch=[join $targets ","]]
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ gdb_caching_proc allow_hipcc_tests {} {
>   		return 0;
>   	    }
>   	} executable $flags]} {
> -	return 0
> +	return {0 "failed to compile hip program"}
>       }
>   
>       return 1


  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-28 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-28 12:23 Simon Marchi
2023-03-28 15:44 ` Tom de Vries [this message]
2023-03-28 15:51   ` Simon Marchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0e0254fc-5fa8-71b2-01b8-cc5742909727@suse.de \
    --to=tdevries@suse.de \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=simon.marchi@efficios.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).