From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-71859-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 5185 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2010 16:07:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 4655 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Apr 2010 16:07:20 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 	tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_FAIL,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:07:16 +0000
Received: from int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.18]) 	by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o38G6dwa031724 	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) 	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 12:07:14 -0400
Received: from [10.15.16.55] (toner.yyz.redhat.com [10.15.16.55]) 	by int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o38G600Q025100; 	Thu, 8 Apr 2010 12:06:36 -0400
Subject: Re: [patch] Backport memory leak fix to 7.1
From: Sami Wagiaalla <swagiaal@redha.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: Sami Wagiaalla <swagiaal@redhat.com>,         GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
In-Reply-To: <m3tys6lbh7.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
References: <4BA8E6DC.7020701@redhat.com> <m3iq8mmvuy.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> 	 <m3tys6lbh7.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:07:00 -0000
Message-Id: <1270742520.2387.2.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00178.txt.bz2


> Tom> I think it is fine to put these on the 7.1 branch, pending , but for
> 
> Oops, bad edit ... I was going to write "pending resolution of the issue
> Ulrich just raised", but then I saw the rest of the thread and forgot to
> either finish the clause or delete it.

Is this okay to go into the gdb_7_1-branch ?
The issue Ulrich raised was resolved by marking the tests are known
failures; that version of the compiler provides incorrect debuginfo.