From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31989 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2010 17:04:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 31980 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Nov 2010 17:04:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from e24smtp01.br.ibm.com (HELO e24smtp01.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.85) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:04:41 +0000 Received: from d24relay01.br.ibm.com (d24relay01.br.ibm.com [9.8.31.16]) by e24smtp01.br.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id oAMHO22e003022 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:24:02 -0200 Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (d24av01.br.ibm.com [9.8.31.91]) by d24relay01.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id oAMH3Ljk2207954 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:03:21 -0300 Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id oAMH4OZj018492 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:04:25 -0200 Received: from [9.8.15.81] ([9.8.15.81]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id oAMH4NuE018466; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:04:23 -0200 Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] Implement support for PowerPC BookE masked and ranged watchpoints From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Jan Kratochvil , Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20101119234530.GL2634@adacore.com> References: <1282074110.2606.703.camel@hactar> <1287807761.10521.423.camel@hactar> <838w1p8egs.fsf@gnu.org> <1288403952.2598.58.camel@hactar> <83wrp05f2f.fsf@gnu.org> <1288648026.3377.7.camel@hactar> <83d3qo5qkj.fsf@gnu.org> <1288905125.14606.4.camel@hactar> <20101116040116.GA19243@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <1290196508.5540.101.camel@hactar> <20101119234530.GL2634@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:04:00 -0000 Message-ID: <1290445473.3164.1.camel@hactar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg00303.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 15:45 -0800, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > So to be honest I'm the only one actually in favor of introducing > > watch-range. :-) So should I drop watch-range then? > > One thing that I was going to propose when I thought I was going to be > the only reviewer was to split the patch a little. The are several > different features being implemented by this patch. If you want, > we can discuss this separately from the other features... I will divide the patch in 3, one for ranged watchpoints, another for masked watchpoints and one for the watch-range command. Was this division you were thinking of? -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann IBM Linux Technology Center