* [PATCH] frame.c: Fix the check for FID_STACK_INVALID in frame_id_eq().
@ 2014-11-25 19:34 Martin Galvan
2014-11-25 20:33 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2014-11-30 15:41 ` Joel Brobecker
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Martin Galvan @ 2014-11-25 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches; +Cc: daniel.gutson
I noticed in frame_id_eq() we were checking for the "l" frame_id being invalid twice instead of checking both "l" and "r", so I corrected it.
gdb/ChangeLog:
2014-11-25 Martin Galvan <martin.galvan@tallertechnologies.com>
* frame.c (frame_id_eq): Fix the check for FID_STACK_INVALID.
---
diff --git a/gdb/frame.c b/gdb/frame.c
index 0663af9..135b820 100644
--- a/gdb/frame.c
+++ b/gdb/frame.c
@@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ frame_id_eq (struct frame_id l, struct frame_id r)
outer_frame_id. */
eq = 1;
else if (l.stack_status == FID_STACK_INVALID
- || l.stack_status == FID_STACK_INVALID)
+ || r.stack_status == FID_STACK_INVALID)
/* Like a NaN, if either ID is invalid, the result is false.
Note that a frame ID is invalid iff it is the null frame ID. */
eq = 0;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] frame.c: Fix the check for FID_STACK_INVALID in frame_id_eq().
2014-11-25 19:34 [PATCH] frame.c: Fix the check for FID_STACK_INVALID in frame_id_eq() Martin Galvan
@ 2014-11-25 20:33 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2014-11-26 1:19 ` Martin Galvan
2014-11-30 15:41 ` Joel Brobecker
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sergio Durigan Junior @ 2014-11-25 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Galvan; +Cc: gdb-patches, daniel.gutson
On Tuesday, November 25 2014, Martin Galvan wrote:
> I noticed in frame_id_eq() we were checking for the "l" frame_id being invalid twice instead of checking both "l" and "r", so I corrected it.
Hi Martin,
Thanks for the patch. I guess it is obvious enough that it could be
checked in without approval, but just to be safe, let's wait until a
maintainer approves it. Meanwhile...
> gdb/ChangeLog:
>
> 2014-11-25 Martin Galvan <martin.galvan@tallertechnologies.com>
>
> * frame.c (frame_id_eq): Fix the check for FID_STACK_INVALID.
The indentation of this ChangeLog entry is wrong. You must use TAB
instead of whitespaces to indent the "*" part.
> ---
>
> diff --git a/gdb/frame.c b/gdb/frame.c
> index 0663af9..135b820 100644
> --- a/gdb/frame.c
> +++ b/gdb/frame.c
> @@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ frame_id_eq (struct frame_id l, struct frame_id r)
> outer_frame_id. */
> eq = 1;
> else if (l.stack_status == FID_STACK_INVALID
> - || l.stack_status == FID_STACK_INVALID)
> + || r.stack_status == FID_STACK_INVALID)
Here, the use of whitespaces is wrong too. And it seems your e-mail
client has mangled the TAB of the old code as well.
> /* Like a NaN, if either ID is invalid, the result is false.
> Note that a frame ID is invalid iff it is the null frame ID. */
> eq = 0;
--
Sergio
GPG key ID: 0x65FC5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] frame.c: Fix the check for FID_STACK_INVALID in frame_id_eq().
2014-11-25 20:33 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
@ 2014-11-26 1:19 ` Martin Galvan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Martin Galvan @ 2014-11-26 1:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sergio Durigan Junior; +Cc: gdb-patches, Daniel Gutson
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior
<sergiodj@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, November 25 2014, Martin Galvan wrote:
>
> > I noticed in frame_id_eq() we were checking for the "l" frame_id being invalid twice instead of checking both "l" and "r", so I corrected it.
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> Thanks for the patch. I guess it is obvious enough that it could be
> checked in without approval, but just to be safe, let's wait until a
> maintainer approves it. Meanwhile...
>
> > gdb/ChangeLog:
> >
> > 2014-11-25 Martin Galvan <martin.galvan@tallertechnologies.com>
> >
> > * frame.c (frame_id_eq): Fix the check for FID_STACK_INVALID.
>
> The indentation of this ChangeLog entry is wrong. You must use TAB
> instead of whitespaces to indent the "*" part.
My mistake. Will remember that for any new patches I send :)
--
Martín Galván
Software Engineer
Taller Technologies Argentina
San Lorenzo 47, 3rd Floor, Office 5
Córdoba, Argentina
Phone: 54 351 4217888 / +54 351 4218211
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] frame.c: Fix the check for FID_STACK_INVALID in frame_id_eq().
2014-11-25 19:34 [PATCH] frame.c: Fix the check for FID_STACK_INVALID in frame_id_eq() Martin Galvan
2014-11-25 20:33 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
@ 2014-11-30 15:41 ` Joel Brobecker
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2014-11-30 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Galvan; +Cc: gdb-patches, daniel.gutson
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1001 bytes --]
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 04:34:48PM -0300, Martin Galvan wrote:
> I noticed in frame_id_eq() we were checking for the "l" frame_id being invalid twice instead of checking both "l" and "r", so I corrected it.
>
> gdb/ChangeLog:
>
> 2014-11-25 Martin Galvan <martin.galvan@tallertechnologies.com>
>
> * frame.c (frame_id_eq): Fix the check for FID_STACK_INVALID.
Thank you for the patch. It does indeed look pretty obvious.
You're patch did not apply for some reason, but since it was so
simple, I just redid it, bearing in mind Sergio's comments.
I then re-ran the testsuite on x86_64-linux to make sure it doesn't
cause any regression.
Attached is what I ended pushing (as both obvious and under 'tiny
patch' rule, meaning that you don't need a copyright assignment
for this change). If you are interested in contributing more patches
to GDB, you'll need a copyright assignement in place with the FSF.
Let us know and we will get you started; the process can be somewhat
lengthy.
--
Joel
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-frame.c-Fix-the-check-for-FID_STACK_INVALID-in-frame.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1567 bytes --]
From 0bba2ddfa79b718e4bab94f2827165bd5b55c92c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Galvan <martin.galvan@tallertechnologies.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 19:34:15 +0400
Subject: [PATCH] frame.c: Fix the check for FID_STACK_INVALID in frame_id_eq()
I noticed in frame_id_eq() we were checking for the "l" frame_id being
invalid twice instead of checking both "l" and "r", so this patch
corrects it.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* frame.c (frame_id_eq): Fix the check for FID_STACK_INVALID.
---
gdb/ChangeLog | 5 +++++
gdb/frame.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog
index 4112438..f706f29 100644
--- a/gdb/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2014-11-30 Martin Galvan <martin.galvan@tallertechnologies.com> (tiny patch, obvious)
+
+ Pushed by Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>.
+ * frame.c (frame_id_eq): Fix the check for FID_STACK_INVALID.
+
2014-11-29 Siva Chandra Reddy <sivachandra@google.com>
* eval.c (evaluate_subexp): Check that the thread stack temporaries
diff --git a/gdb/frame.c b/gdb/frame.c
index 0663af9..75ad341 100644
--- a/gdb/frame.c
+++ b/gdb/frame.c
@@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ frame_id_eq (struct frame_id l, struct frame_id r)
outer_frame_id. */
eq = 1;
else if (l.stack_status == FID_STACK_INVALID
- || l.stack_status == FID_STACK_INVALID)
+ || r.stack_status == FID_STACK_INVALID)
/* Like a NaN, if either ID is invalid, the result is false.
Note that a frame ID is invalid iff it is the null frame ID. */
eq = 0;
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-11-30 15:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-11-25 19:34 [PATCH] frame.c: Fix the check for FID_STACK_INVALID in frame_id_eq() Martin Galvan
2014-11-25 20:33 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2014-11-26 1:19 ` Martin Galvan
2014-11-30 15:41 ` Joel Brobecker
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).