From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23027 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2015 16:09:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 23015 invoked by uid 89); 6 Jan 2015 16:09:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mailapp01.imgtec.com Received: from mailapp01.imgtec.com (HELO mailapp01.imgtec.com) (195.59.15.196) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 16:09:38 +0000 Received: from KLMAIL01.kl.imgtec.org (unknown [192.168.5.35]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 71B76907695A5; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 16:09:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from BAMAIL02.ba.imgtec.org (10.20.40.28) by KLMAIL01.kl.imgtec.org (192.168.5.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 16:09:36 +0000 Received: from [192.168.65.53] (192.168.65.53) by bamail02.ba.imgtec.org (10.20.40.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.174.1; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 08:09:29 -0800 Message-ID: <1420560568.15691.25.camel@ubuntu-sellcey> Subject: Re: GDB 7.9 branching - 2 weeks to go (Mon, Jan 12th)! From: Steve Ellcey Reply-To: To: Joel Brobecker CC: Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 16:09:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20141230071500.GF2123@adacore.com> References: <20141230071500.GF2123@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00078.txt.bz2 On Tue, 2014-12-30 at 11:15 +0400, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Hello, > > Just a quick reminder that we're about 2 weeks away from our targeted > branching date for GDB 7.9. Jan 12th is only a week after what I expect > to be most people's return to work (Mon Jan 5th), so might be a little > tight. > > But, at the moment, there is no blocking item listed. I will add > PR gdb/17525 (target-async: breakpoint commands not executed when > program run from -x script), but only blocking for the release. > I don't think the problem is severe enough that it warrants blocking > the branch. I think PR gdb/17718 should be considered a blocking bug because it breaks the builds on some systems (depending on what version of GCC is used to build). There is some discussion of how it should be fixed in the defect report and in https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-12/msg00501.html and other email threads. Steve Ellcey sellcey@imgtec.com