public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Ellcey <sellcey@imgtec.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>, Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>,
	Chen Gang	<gang.chen@sunrus.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [Patch] Fix build problem with system call in compile/compile.c
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:36:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1420655766.15691.44.camel@ubuntu-sellcey> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150107041351.GN5445@adacore.com>

On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 08:13 +0400, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > > Does it work to cast the result of the call to system to (void)
> > > instead? In your case, I fear that you'd be exchanging one warning
> > > (return value being ignored) by another (value assigned but never
> > > used).
> > 
> > No, I tried using "(void) system (zap);" instead of "i = system (zap);"
> > and I still got the warning message.
> 
> In that case, I have no objection to your patch either, provided
> a small comment is added to explain why we allow ourselves to ignore
> the return value (and since you'll be touching that code anyways,
> I would also rename your variable to something more explicit, such
> as "ignored" or "unused" for instance).
> 
> Thank you,

I am not sure why we allow ourselves to ignore the return value.  Maybe
we shouldn't.  Chen Gang submitted a different patch where the return
value is checked.  Should we use that instead?

        https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-01/msg00011.html


Steve Ellcey
sellcey@imgtec.com

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-07 18:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-06  0:44 Steve Ellcey 
2015-01-06  3:09 ` Yao Qi
2015-01-06  4:16 ` Joel Brobecker
2015-01-06 16:04   ` Steve Ellcey
2015-01-07  4:14     ` Joel Brobecker
2015-01-07 18:36       ` Steve Ellcey [this message]
2015-01-07 19:01         ` Pedro Alves
2015-01-07 19:29         ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2015-01-07 19:35           ` Pedro Alves
2015-01-07 23:33             ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2015-01-08 21:12               ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-01-08 22:12                 ` Steve Ellcey
2015-01-08 23:22                   ` Pedro Alves
2015-01-09  0:10                     ` Steve Ellcey
2015-01-09  3:47                       ` Chen Gang S
2015-01-09 10:11                         ` Pedro Alves
2015-01-09 10:46                           ` Chen Gang S
2015-01-09 20:52                             ` Chen Gang S
2015-01-09 21:53                               ` Chen Gang S
2015-01-10  4:30                               ` Joel Brobecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1420655766.15691.44.camel@ubuntu-sellcey \
    --to=sellcey@imgtec.com \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gang.chen@sunrus.com.cn \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=yao@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).