From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7528 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2015 22:12:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 7466 invoked by uid 89); 8 Jan 2015 22:12:15 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mailapp01.imgtec.com Received: from mailapp01.imgtec.com (HELO mailapp01.imgtec.com) (195.59.15.196) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 22:12:14 +0000 Received: from KLMAIL01.kl.imgtec.org (unknown [192.168.5.35]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 3E6F91BB3E3E; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 22:12:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from BAMAIL02.ba.imgtec.org (10.20.40.28) by KLMAIL01.kl.imgtec.org (192.168.5.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 22:12:11 +0000 Received: from [192.168.65.53] (192.168.65.53) by bamail02.ba.imgtec.org (10.20.40.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.174.1; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 14:12:03 -0800 Message-ID: <1420755123.2630.21.camel@ubuntu-sellcey> Subject: Re: [Patch] Fix build problem with system call in compile/compile.c From: Steve Ellcey Reply-To: To: Jan Kratochvil CC: "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Pedro Alves , Joel Brobecker , , Yao Qi , Chen Gang Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 22:12:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20150108211229.GA5634@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20150106041615.GJ5445@adacore.com> <1420560255.15691.21.camel@ubuntu-sellcey> <20150107041351.GN5445@adacore.com> <1420655766.15691.44.camel@ubuntu-sellcey> <54AD8A76.9010702@redhat.com> <20150108211229.GA5634@host2.jankratochvil.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00202.txt.bz2 On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 22:12 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 00:33:06 +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Jan 2015, Pedro Alves wrote: > > > > Therefore I think it would be best to rewrite it to only use the relevant > > > > C library calls like `remove' and `rmdir' to recursively remove a > > > > directory; I wonder if actually we don't have something relevant already > > > > available in libiberty or gnulib. > > > > > > Jan's working on that already. See the ftw discussion, and the gnulib > > > patches. > > > > OK, great! > > I have some patches here but I have suspended the work until the mingw pending > patches get resolved so that one can test further patches on top of that: > Re: [patch 1/2] mingw: update gnulib: prepare the sources > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-12/msg00626.html > Message-ID: <20141224222045.GA30482@host2.jankratochvil.net> > + > [patch 2/2] mingw: update gnulib: the gnulib files > Message-ID: <20141222221330.GA31091@host2.jankratochvil.net> > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-12/msg00610.html > > > Jan Does that mean it won't get into GDB 7.9 (branching on Monday, January 12th). If so I would like to see Chen's patch get checked in as a temporary build fix before the branch. I haven't seen any objection to Chen's patch but I haven't seen an official approval either. Steve Ellcey sellcey@imgtec.com