From: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH] Simplify regcache_cpy and remove regcache::cpy_no_passthrough
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 07:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1498549057-3942-1-git-send-email-yao.qi@linaro.org> (raw)
Nowadays, regcache_cpy is used where src is read-only and dst is not
read-only, so the regcache_cpy can be simplified to handle this case only.
As a result, regcache::cpy_no_passthrough, which is about two read-only
regcache copy, is no longer used, remove it as well.
Regression tested on x86_64-linux, both native and gdbserver.
gdb:
2017-06-27 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
* regcache.c (regcache_cpy): Simplify it.
(regcache::cpy_no_passthrough): Remove it.
* regcache.h (cpy_no_passthrough): Remove it.
---
gdb/regcache.c | 31 ++-----------------------------
gdb/regcache.h | 2 --
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/regcache.c b/gdb/regcache.c
index 7eeb737..e8f92d6 100644
--- a/gdb/regcache.c
+++ b/gdb/regcache.c
@@ -388,36 +388,9 @@ regcache_cpy (struct regcache *dst, struct regcache *src)
gdb_assert (src != NULL && dst != NULL);
gdb_assert (src->m_descr->gdbarch == dst->m_descr->gdbarch);
gdb_assert (src != dst);
- gdb_assert (src->m_readonly_p || dst->m_readonly_p);
+ gdb_assert (src->m_readonly_p && !dst->m_readonly_p);
- if (!src->m_readonly_p)
- regcache_save (dst, do_cooked_read, src);
- else if (!dst->m_readonly_p)
- dst->restore (src);
- else
- dst->cpy_no_passthrough (src);
-}
-
-/* Copy/duplicate the contents of a register cache. Unlike regcache_cpy,
- which is pass-through, this does not go through to the target.
- Only values values already in the cache are transferred. The SRC and DST
- buffers must not overlap. */
-
-void
-regcache::cpy_no_passthrough (struct regcache *src)
-{
- gdb_assert (src != NULL);
- gdb_assert (src->m_descr->gdbarch == m_descr->gdbarch);
- /* NOTE: cagney/2002-05-17: Don't let the caller do a no-passthrough
- move of data into a thread's regcache. Doing this would be silly
- - it would mean that regcache->register_status would be
- completely invalid. */
- gdb_assert (m_readonly_p && src->m_readonly_p);
-
- memcpy (m_registers, src->m_registers,
- m_descr->sizeof_cooked_registers);
- memcpy (m_register_status, src->m_register_status,
- m_descr->sizeof_cooked_register_status);
+ dst->restore (src);
}
struct regcache *
diff --git a/gdb/regcache.h b/gdb/regcache.h
index b416d5e..03c042a 100644
--- a/gdb/regcache.h
+++ b/gdb/regcache.h
@@ -369,8 +369,6 @@ private:
void restore (struct regcache *src);
- void cpy_no_passthrough (struct regcache *src);
-
enum register_status xfer_part (int regnum, int offset, int len, void *in,
const void *out,
decltype (regcache_raw_read) read,
--
1.9.1
next reply other threads:[~2017-06-27 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-27 7:37 Yao Qi [this message]
2017-07-17 9:04 ` Alan Hayward
2017-07-17 11:32 ` Yao Qi
2017-07-18 9:01 ` Alan Hayward
2017-07-18 11:49 ` Yao Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1498549057-3942-1-git-send-email-yao.qi@linaro.org \
--to=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).