From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3294 invoked by alias); 4 Jan 2018 08:36:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 3072 invoked by uid 89); 4 Jan 2018 08:35:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:707, coordination X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 08:35:57 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB07D117084 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 03:35:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id KIpEBPgPrOuF for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 03:35:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from tron.gnat.com (tron.gnat.com [205.232.38.10]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A82D5116E2E for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 03:35:55 -0500 (EST) Received: by tron.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 4233) id A27A248A; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 03:35:55 -0500 (EST) From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: FYI/pushed: Additional tests showing regression post C++ wild matching Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 08:36:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1515054953-81012-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> X-SW-Source: 2018-01/txt/msg00052.txt.bz2 Hello, I have just pushed the following commits to master, that highlight other situations where the C++ wild matching patch series introduces a regression for Ada. * [PATCH 1/3] Add gdb.ada/info_addr_mixed_case new testcase * [PATCH 2/3] Add "complete break ada" test to gdb.ada/complete.exp * [PATCH 3/3] Add new gdb.ada/bp_c_mixed_case testcase for PR gdb/22670 Those tests should all be KFAIL-ed for now, so as to avoid generating new FAILs. I wanted to have those in sooner rather than later, to faciliate coordination with Pedro. Reviews are still appreciated, and will be taken into account without delay. Thanks! -- Joel