public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] Re-write partial_die_info allocation in load_partial_dies
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 15:36:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1519313796-2397-2-git-send-email-yao.qi@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1519313796-2397-1-git-send-email-yao.qi@linaro.org>

load_partial_dies has a "while (1)" loop to visit each die, and create
partial_die_info if needed in each iteration, like this,

  part_die = XOBNEW (&cu->comp_unit_obstack, struct partial_die_info);

  while (1)
   {
      if (foo1) continue;

      if (foo2) continue;

      read_partial_die (, , part_die, ,);

      ....
      part_die = XOBNEW (&cu->comp_unit_obstack, struct partial_die_info);
   };

the code was written in a way that spaces are allocated on necessary on
cu->comp_unit_obstack.  I want to class-fy partial_die_info, but
partial_die_info ctor can't follow XOBNEW immediately, so this patch
rewrite this loop to:

  while (1)
   {
      if (foo1) continue;

      if (foo2) continue;

      struct partial_die_info pdi;
      read_partial_die (, , &pdi, ,);

      part_die = XOBNEW (&cu->comp_unit_obstack, struct partial_die_info);
      memcpy (part_die, &pdi, sizeof (pdi));
   };

we create a local variable pdi, if we need it, call XOBNEW, and copy.
This also reduce one XOBNEW call.  I measured the number of XOBNEW call in
load_partial_dies when gdb reads dwarf2read.o, without this patch, it is
18827, and with this patch, it is 18826.

gdb:

2018-01-18  Yao Qi  <yao.qi@linaro.org>

	* dwarf2read.c (load_partial_dies): Move the location of XOBNEW.
---
 gdb/dwarf2read.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/dwarf2read.c b/gdb/dwarf2read.c
index 6cdb963..81b42cf 100644
--- a/gdb/dwarf2read.c
+++ b/gdb/dwarf2read.c
@@ -18216,7 +18216,6 @@ load_partial_dies (const struct die_reader_specs *reader,
 {
   struct dwarf2_cu *cu = reader->cu;
   struct objfile *objfile = cu->per_cu->dwarf2_per_objfile->objfile;
-  struct partial_die_info *part_die;
   struct partial_die_info *parent_die, *last_die, *first_die = NULL;
   unsigned int bytes_read;
   unsigned int load_all = 0;
@@ -18238,8 +18237,6 @@ load_partial_dies (const struct die_reader_specs *reader,
 			    hashtab_obstack_allocate,
 			    dummy_obstack_deallocate);
 
-  part_die = XOBNEW (&cu->comp_unit_obstack, struct partial_die_info);
-
   while (1)
     {
       abbrev_info *abbrev = peek_die_abbrev (*reader, info_ptr, &bytes_read);
@@ -18248,15 +18245,8 @@ load_partial_dies (const struct die_reader_specs *reader,
       if (abbrev == NULL)
 	{
 	  if (--nesting_level == 0)
-	    {
-	      /* PART_DIE was probably the last thing allocated on the
-		 comp_unit_obstack, so we could call obstack_free
-		 here.  We don't do that because the waste is small,
-		 and will be cleaned up when we're done with this
-		 compilation unit.  This way, we're also more robust
-		 against other users of the comp_unit_obstack.  */
-	      return first_die;
-	    }
+	    return first_die;
+
 	  info_ptr += bytes_read;
 	  last_die = parent_die;
 	  parent_die = parent_die->die_parent;
@@ -18314,7 +18304,10 @@ load_partial_dies (const struct die_reader_specs *reader,
 	  continue;
 	}
 
-      info_ptr = read_partial_die (reader, part_die, abbrev, bytes_read,
+      struct partial_die_info pdi;
+
+      memset (&pdi, 0, sizeof (pdi));
+      info_ptr = read_partial_die (reader, &pdi, abbrev, bytes_read,
 				   info_ptr);
 
       /* This two-pass algorithm for processing partial symbols has a
@@ -18334,18 +18327,18 @@ load_partial_dies (const struct die_reader_specs *reader,
 	 of them, for a language without namespaces), can be processed
 	 directly.  */
       if (parent_die == NULL
-	  && part_die->has_specification == 0
-	  && part_die->is_declaration == 0
-	  && ((part_die->tag == DW_TAG_typedef && !part_die->has_children)
-	      || part_die->tag == DW_TAG_base_type
-	      || part_die->tag == DW_TAG_subrange_type))
-	{
-	  if (building_psymtab && part_die->name != NULL)
-	    add_psymbol_to_list (part_die->name, strlen (part_die->name), 0,
+	  && pdi.has_specification == 0
+	  && pdi.is_declaration == 0
+	  && ((pdi.tag == DW_TAG_typedef && !pdi.has_children)
+	      || pdi.tag == DW_TAG_base_type
+	      || pdi.tag == DW_TAG_subrange_type))
+	{
+	  if (building_psymtab && pdi.name != NULL)
+	    add_psymbol_to_list (pdi.name, strlen (pdi.name), 0,
 				 VAR_DOMAIN, LOC_TYPEDEF,
 				 &objfile->static_psymbols,
 				 0, cu->language, objfile);
-	  info_ptr = locate_pdi_sibling (reader, part_die, info_ptr);
+	  info_ptr = locate_pdi_sibling (reader, &pdi, info_ptr);
 	  continue;
 	}
 
@@ -18357,37 +18350,41 @@ load_partial_dies (const struct die_reader_specs *reader,
 	 it could not find the child DIEs referenced later, this is checked
 	 above.  In correct DWARF DW_TAG_typedef should have no children.  */
 
-      if (part_die->tag == DW_TAG_typedef && part_die->has_children)
+      if (pdi.tag == DW_TAG_typedef && pdi.has_children)
 	complaint (&symfile_complaints,
 		   _("DW_TAG_typedef has childen - GCC PR debug/47510 bug "
 		     "- DIE at 0x%x [in module %s]"),
-		   to_underlying (part_die->sect_off), objfile_name (objfile));
+		   to_underlying (pdi.sect_off), objfile_name (objfile));
 
       /* If we're at the second level, and we're an enumerator, and
 	 our parent has no specification (meaning possibly lives in a
 	 namespace elsewhere), then we can add the partial symbol now
 	 instead of queueing it.  */
-      if (part_die->tag == DW_TAG_enumerator
+      if (pdi.tag == DW_TAG_enumerator
 	  && parent_die != NULL
 	  && parent_die->die_parent == NULL
 	  && parent_die->tag == DW_TAG_enumeration_type
 	  && parent_die->has_specification == 0)
 	{
-	  if (part_die->name == NULL)
+	  if (pdi.name == NULL)
 	    complaint (&symfile_complaints,
 		       _("malformed enumerator DIE ignored"));
 	  else if (building_psymtab)
-	    add_psymbol_to_list (part_die->name, strlen (part_die->name), 0,
+	    add_psymbol_to_list (pdi.name, strlen (pdi.name), 0,
 				 VAR_DOMAIN, LOC_CONST,
 				 cu->language == language_cplus
 				 ? &objfile->global_psymbols
 				 : &objfile->static_psymbols,
 				 0, cu->language, objfile);
 
-	  info_ptr = locate_pdi_sibling (reader, part_die, info_ptr);
+	  info_ptr = locate_pdi_sibling (reader, &pdi, info_ptr);
 	  continue;
 	}
 
+      struct partial_die_info *part_die
+	  = XOBNEW (&cu->comp_unit_obstack, struct partial_die_info);
+
+      memcpy (part_die, &pdi, sizeof (pdi));
       /* We'll save this DIE so link it in.  */
       part_die->die_parent = parent_die;
       part_die->die_sibling = NULL;
@@ -18439,8 +18436,6 @@ load_partial_dies (const struct die_reader_specs *reader,
 	  *slot = part_die;
 	}
 
-      part_die = XOBNEW (&cu->comp_unit_obstack, struct partial_die_info);
-
       /* For some DIEs we want to follow their children (if any).  For C
 	 we have no reason to follow the children of structures; for other
 	 languages we have to, so that we can get at method physnames
-- 
1.9.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-02-22 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-22 15:36 [PATCH 0/7 v2] Class-fy partial_die_info Yao Qi
2018-02-22 15:36 ` [PATCH 6/7] Move fixup_partial_die to partial_die_info::fixup Yao Qi
2018-02-22 15:36 ` [PATCH 2/7] Don't check abbrev is NULL in read_partial_die Yao Qi
2018-02-25 23:33   ` Simon Marchi
2018-02-22 15:36 ` [PATCH 7/7] Move read_partial_die to partial_die_info::read Yao Qi
2018-02-22 15:36 ` Yao Qi [this message]
2018-02-22 15:36 ` [PATCH 3/7] Change find_partial_die_in_comp_unit to dwarf2_cu::find_partial_die Yao Qi
2018-02-22 15:36 ` [PATCH 5/7] Remove one argument abbrev_len in read_partial_die Yao Qi
2018-02-22 15:36 ` [PATCH 4/7] Class-fy partial_die_info Yao Qi
2018-02-25 23:52 ` [PATCH 0/7 v2] " Simon Marchi
2018-02-26 15:39   ` Yao Qi
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-01-25  9:38 [PATCH 0/7] " Yao Qi
2018-01-25  9:38 ` [PATCH 1/7] Re-write partial_die_info allocation in load_partial_dies Yao Qi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1519313796-2397-2-git-send-email-yao.qi@linaro.org \
    --to=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).