From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 128084 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2018 20:38:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 128063 invoked by uid 89); 29 Jun 2018 20:38:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=online, HContent-Transfer-Encoding:8bit X-HELO: mailsec107.isp.belgacom.be Received: from mailsec107.isp.belgacom.be (HELO mailsec107.isp.belgacom.be) (195.238.20.103) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 20:38:25 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=skynet.be; i=@skynet.be; q=dns/txt; s=securemail; t=1530304705; x=1561840705; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FRhiBW+NBrYZnn6X2yO+mf+7+dz7y6Ybkx5AAq6sPuM=; b=lDJORvLHdB2fm8YRoHZTjDrHwzNGErvkg/jY3G1te2aL63Br+ag4Kkvx vOD8937Gm+EuKwHUtzt7iv95PKdjsQ==; Received: from 224.41-64-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO md) ([87.64.41.224]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Jun 2018 22:38:23 +0200 Message-ID: <1530304703.1512.17.camel@skynet.be> Subject: Re: [RFA_v3 0/8] Implement 'frame apply COMMAND', enhance 'thread apply COMMAND' From: Philippe Waroquiers To: Andrew Burgess Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 20:38:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1530303340.1512.15.camel@skynet.be> References: <20180624183708.888-1-philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be> <20180629122158.GH15881@embecosm.com> <1530303340.1512.15.camel@skynet.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-06/txt/msg00733.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2018-06-29 at 22:15 +0200, Philippe Waroquiers wrote: > Whatever we take, we have to ensure that gdb.texinfo systematically use  > it to identify a frame as shown by backtrace (#integer). Note that in the online help, we have already some usages of level speaking about frames. So, all that taken into account, my preference would be to remove the frame number wording, and use frame level everywhere in the doc and online help : LEVEL seems more clear/intuitive than NUMBER or ID But whatever choice is ok for me. Philippe