From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 57284 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2019 21:44:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 57269 invoked by uid 89); 27 Feb 2019 21:44:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=UD:be, 20190219, 2019-02-19, waited X-HELO: mailsec114.isp.belgacom.be Received: from mailsec114.isp.belgacom.be (HELO mailsec114.isp.belgacom.be) (195.238.20.110) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 21:44:29 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=skynet.be; i=@skynet.be; q=dns/txt; s=securemail; t=1551303869; x=1582839869; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ef+sLJxU21lQwtD90UOqVr8tRqktEwxLKFZ2Nd9kI20=; b=V6omoYMWI2pJ9KVYdDl+ZHoEjDPx2AGK9OaNkFhC+BtAEmTbGG5HdVhn Wng8chlimXVobaQaGHiQDe9qPn8EJQ==; Received: from 147.122-130-109.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO md) ([109.130.122.147]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Feb 2019 22:44:27 +0100 Message-ID: <1551303866.1459.7.camel@skynet.be> Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix regcache leak, and avoid possible regcache access after detach. From: Philippe Waroquiers To: Kevin Buettner , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 21:44:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20190219164406.43969e3c@f29-4.lan> References: <20190216205810.1253-1-philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be> <20190219164406.43969e3c@f29-4.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-02/txt/msg00541.txt.bz2 On Tue, 2019-02-19 at 16:44 -0700, Kevin Buettner wrote: > Okay with those changes, assuming that all goes well with the > native-gdbserver testing. Thanks for the review. I have just pushed the patch, after doing the suggested fixes, successfully tested with native gdbserver, and waited for the branching just to be sure. Philippe