From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20852 invoked by alias); 24 Jun 2016 19:28:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 20797 invoked by uid 89); 24 Jun 2016 19:28:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:662 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 19:28:27 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E3D5C057EC9; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 19:28:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u5OJSPeV025978; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 15:28:25 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] Fix failure to detach if process exits while detaching on Linux To: Yao Qi References: <1466119968-15171-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <1466119968-15171-4-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <86k2hnsvk0.fsf@gmail.com> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <15ac6760-0c08-09a6-38a3-6a124ee2731f@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 19:28:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <86k2hnsvk0.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-06/txt/msg00405.txt.bz2 On 06/17/2016 04:07 PM, Yao Qi wrote: > Pedro Alves writes: > >> +# If testing single-process, simply detach from the process. >> +# >> +# If testing multi-process, first detach from the child, then detach >> +# from the parent and confirm that the parent exits, thus unsuring > > s/unsuring/ensuring/ ? Indeed. >> + } else { >> + perror "unhandled command: $mode: $cmd" > > no variable "mode". Whoops, there used to be one. Fixed now (the two instances): - perror "unhandled command: $mode: $cmd" + perror "unhandled command: $cmd" Thanks, Pedro Alves