Re: Building today's snapshot of GDB with MinGW

[Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>]

On 7/27/20 12:05 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 7/27/20 11:49 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> On 7/3/20 5:25 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>>>> I can submit a change, but it would be difficult for me to try it, and
>>>> regenerate configure in general (I don't have the right version of
>>>> Autotools installed).  Would it be okay to send a change and ask
>>>> someone to do the rest?
>>>
>>> No problem; if you send me the configure.xxx change, I can re-run
>>> autoconf et al, and send you a diff with the regenerated files.
>>> We can do that as a private exchange to avoid bothering everyone
>>> else for that part.
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> [ I suppose this is the last message related to commit 05a6b8c28b "Don't
>> unnecessarily redefine 'socklen_t' type in MinGW builds.". ]
>>
>> I ran into a build breaker related to this commit:
>> ...
>> src/gdb/ser-tcp.c:65:13: error: conflicting declaration ‘typedef int
>> socklen_t’
>>    65 | typedef int socklen_t;
>>       |             ^~~~~~~~~
>> In file included from ../gnulib/import/unistd.h:40,
>>                  from
>> /home/vries/gdb_versions/devel/src/gdb/../gnulib/import/pathmax.h:42,
>>                  from
>> /home/vries/gdb_versions/devel/src/gdb/../gdbsupport/common-defs.h:120,
>>                  from /home/vries/gdb_versions/devel/src/gdb/defs.h:28,
>>                  from /home/vries/gdb_versions/devel/src/gdb/ser-tcp.c:20:
>> /usr/include/unistd.h:277:21: note: previous declaration as ‘typedef
>> __socklen_t socklen_t’
>>   277 | typedef __socklen_t socklen_t;
>>       |                     ^~~~~~~~~
>> ...
>>
> 
> Hmm, this looks fishy:
> ...
> /* Define to 1 if you have the <sys/sockets.h> header file. */
> 
> #undef HAVE_SYS_SOCKETS_H
> 
> 
> 
> /* Define to 1 if you have the <sys/socket.h> header file. */
> 
> #undef HAVE_SYS_SOCKET_H
>                       ...
> 
> Anyway, in configure.ac, the check for HAVE_SYS_SOCKET_H comes before
> the check for HAVE_SOCKLEN_T, but in configure, that order is reversed,
> which is the root cause for the breakage.
> 
> It looks like AC_CHECK_HEADERS accumulated checks for different header
> files, and that that caused the order reversal.
> 

Scrap that.

It's a typo : sys/sockets.h instead of sys/socket.h.

Thanks,
- Tom