From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Received: from mail.efficios.com (mail.efficios.com [167.114.26.124])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5CC73846047
 for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 19:13:19 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org A5CC73846047
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.efficios.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FF862413E7;
 Mon, 30 Nov 2020 14:13:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail.efficios.com ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mail03.efficios.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032)
 with ESMTP id pbLrIvq-ozwZ; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 14:13:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.efficios.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C4A241657;
 Mon, 30 Nov 2020 14:13:18 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail.efficios.com F0C4A241657
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at efficios.com
Received: from mail.efficios.com ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mail03.efficios.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026)
 with ESMTP id tgeSUm17iw6V; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 14:13:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [10.0.0.11] (173-246-6-90.qc.cable.ebox.net [173.246.6.90])
 by mail.efficios.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C2921241B03;
 Mon, 30 Nov 2020 14:13:18 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] gdb: move displaced stepping logic to gdbarch,
 allow starting concurrent displaced steps
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>, Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>,
 gdb-patches@sourceware.org
References: <20201110214614.2842615-1-simon.marchi@efficios.com>
 <20201110214614.2842615-10-simon.marchi@efficios.com>
 <72a75576-a54b-bcc8-e8d3-5a57571fe234@palves.net>
 <1e9654db-de61-a5d4-48c3-a493b8598f0d@efficios.com>
 <718c6626-c9c5-f24d-a3f4-94acd1552e1d@simark.ca>
 <d128bbb3-b884-8841-deea-f85998498152@palves.net>
From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Message-ID: <182dd548-767f-1f83-bac8-195760e78f35@efficios.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 14:13:18 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <d128bbb3-b884-8841-deea-f85998498152@palves.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,
 SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/gdb-patches>,
 <mailto:gdb-patches-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/gdb-patches>,
 <mailto:gdb-patches-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 19:13:20 -0000

On 2020-11-26 9:25 a.m., Pedro Alves wrote:
> My personal preference is that when you need to put one of the
> statements in its own line, then put all statements in their own line:
> 
>  for (thread_info *iter = tp->step_over_next; 
>       iter != tp;
>       iter = iter->step_over_next)
>    ++num;

Ack.

Simon