From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B535D3858D28 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 19:59:45 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org B535D3858D28 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark.ca Received: from [172.16.0.64] (192-222-180-24.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.180.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 316D81E110; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 14:59:45 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1673985585; bh=6KiL4ylnvzfmfWvlrAu3cuiwwNboEAJ4PGPvVrMPTgc=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=keSvxEU8OleIroFxpYtxf/YyhdHr1EKmg++nUjq2PCuEIe/I8CR2DG7iQSBbFjalF Iq+Q2/RTOtqpixciln0eDNEX+ljxEX+sDj/Rdu9TSE1vxas3xGrjiaO1j9uZZLHA0R U5vYGznNv874i39iOrCFByeU/HekatdpWHI6GToE= Message-ID: <19643926-4cec-a349-42e5-1ec671d7a81b@simark.ca> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 14:59:44 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove two unused fields from gdbarch Content-Language: fr To: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20230117194612.3433270-1-tromey@adacore.com> From: Simon Marchi In-Reply-To: <20230117194612.3433270-1-tromey@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 1/17/23 14:46, Tom Tromey via Gdb-patches wrote: > When I converted gdbarch to use the registry, I forgot to remove the > two fields that were used to implement the previous approach. This > patch removes them. Tested by rebuilding. LGTM (seems obvious even). Simon