From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Peter Bergner <bergner@vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>,
Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] Add support for choosing disassembler cpu in GDB for POWER.
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 19:35:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1e8b09d0-5a4f-402f-f684-b9eb0fc383ca@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8bfd2bd6-c2b3-cf5e-c689-897b877970f1@vnet.ibm.com>
On 10/11/2016 07:48 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
>>
>
> I'm fine going with whatever option name people prefer. If you want
> "disassembler-options" instead of just "disassembler", ok, but shouldn't
> ARM be renamed then as well if it uses this mechanism?
I think so. That wouldn't break anyone's scripts, since "disassembler"
is an unambiguous prefix of "disassembler-options", and thus gdb
would still accept "disassembler".
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-12 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-30 2:14 Peter Bergner
2016-09-30 17:55 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-10-03 20:25 ` Peter Bergner
2016-10-03 22:25 ` Alan Modra
2016-10-06 3:00 ` Peter Bergner
2016-10-06 4:44 ` Alan Modra
2016-10-06 9:52 ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-06 19:26 ` Peter Bergner
2016-10-07 19:21 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-10-07 21:01 ` Peter Bergner
2016-10-08 14:39 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-10-10 23:28 ` Peter Bergner
2016-10-12 8:08 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-10-12 10:46 ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-11 0:09 ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-11 18:49 ` Peter Bergner
2016-10-12 8:25 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-10-27 0:04 ` Peter Bergner
2016-10-27 9:40 ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-28 13:47 ` Peter Bergner
2016-10-28 14:10 ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-28 14:24 ` Peter Bergner
2016-10-28 14:30 ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-28 14:53 ` Peter Bergner
2016-11-03 11:01 ` Pedro Alves
2016-11-03 15:02 ` Peter Bergner
2016-11-03 15:06 ` Peter Bergner
2016-11-03 16:41 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-11-03 16:49 ` Peter Bergner
2016-10-28 12:32 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-10-28 13:45 ` Peter Bergner
2016-10-28 14:15 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-10-28 15:02 ` Peter Bergner
2016-10-28 18:47 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-11-02 23:28 ` Peter Bergner
2016-10-12 19:35 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1e8b09d0-5a4f-402f-f684-b9eb0fc383ca@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=amodra@gmail.com \
--cc=bergner@vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).