From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5840 invoked by alias); 4 May 2010 14:58:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 5830 invoked by uid 22791); 4 May 2010 14:58:09 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 14:57:55 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0AAD2BAB5D for ; Tue, 4 May 2010 10:57:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ABmzq-EPna-P for ; Tue, 4 May 2010 10:57:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB182BAB56 for ; Tue, 4 May 2010 10:57:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 844AAF58F9; Tue, 4 May 2010 07:57:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 14:58:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Adding support for VxWorks target Message-ID: <20100504145744.GG2768@adacore.com> References: <1272210447-13895-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1272210447-13895-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg00066.txt.bz2 Hello, > The following series of patches adds support for cross debugging > VxWorks targets (version 5.x, 6.x and limited support for VxWorks 653). > It's a lot of code overall, and many patches, but it is almost > completely contained in dedicated files, and we've split the changes > in modules/patches, hoping to make it easier for anyone wanting to > look at them. Just wondering what the general sentiment is towards these patches? I just did a resync at AdaCore, and noticed a break due to the various attribute changes. It's not big deal to fix those, but now I have to do keep two sets of patches up to date... If people are indifferent/interested, then I'd like to look at checking in the series sometime soonish - and I would work on doco in the meantime. Cheers! -- Joel