From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18073 invoked by alias); 27 Jun 2010 17:18:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 18060 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jun 2010 17:18:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.44.51) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 17:18:13 +0000 Received: from kpbe11.cbf.corp.google.com (kpbe11.cbf.corp.google.com [172.25.105.75]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o5RHIANR026543 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 10:18:11 -0700 Received: from ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com (ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com [172.18.118.116]) by kpbe11.cbf.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o5RHIAEs022815 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 10:18:10 -0700 Received: by ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com (Postfix, from userid 67641) id D14B584613; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 10:18:09 -0700 (PDT) To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: [commit] Update m-static.exp test for optimised -> optimized Message-Id: <20100627171809.D14B584613@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 17:18:00 -0000 From: dje@google.com (Doug Evans) X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg00620.txt.bz2 Hi. Missed this in earlier patch to fix the spelling of "optimized". Committed. 2010-06-27 Doug Evans testsuite/ * gdb.cp/m-static.exp: Update expected test output. Index: gdb.cp/m-static.exp =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.exp,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -p -r1.11 m-static.exp --- gdb.cp/m-static.exp 5 May 2010 18:06:58 -0000 1.11 +++ gdb.cp/m-static.exp 27 Jun 2010 17:16:20 -0000 @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ gdb_test "print test3.data.value_derived gdb_test "print test4.elsewhere" "\\$\[0-9\].* = 221" "static const int initialized elsewhere" # static const int that nobody initializes. From PR gdb/635. -gdb_test "print test4.nowhere" "field nowhere is nonexistent or has been optimised out" "static const int initialized nowhere" +gdb_test "print test4.nowhere" "field nowhere is nonexistent or has been optimized out" "static const int initialized nowhere" # Perhaps at some point test4 should also include a test for a static # const int that was initialized in the header file. But I'm not sure