From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29704 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2010 17:36:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 29696 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jul 2010 17:36:52 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:36:48 +0000 Received: from int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.18]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o66HalMS031889 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 13:36:47 -0400 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o66Haihl011783 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 6 Jul 2010 13:36:46 -0400 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o66HaiqC025924; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 19:36:44 +0200 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o66HaiJw025922; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 19:36:44 +0200 Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:36:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [3/4] RFC: add DWARF index support Message-ID: <20100706173644.GA25792@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <20100704181758.GA30603@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20100706171142.GA24412@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg00100.txt.bz2 On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 19:31:08 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote: > It just seems unlikely to me that we will be able to get this change in. > Don't we actually have to change it in glibc? glibc has to fix it even for other applications anyway unless they all would carry their forked statically-linked obstack (as Fedora GDB does). I already posted it there in a backward-forward compatible way. It just sits in the queue of to-be-(re)submitted Fedora patches now. http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2007-01/msg00090.html Regards, Jan