From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25231 invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2010 16:00:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 25216 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jul 2010 16:00:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:00:42 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1862BABF8; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:00:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id YDXsbfYiX5q8; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:00:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BCBE2BABF1; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:00:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4056FF58FA; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:00:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:00:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Pedro Alves , mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [patch] Forbid run with a core file loaded Message-ID: <20100727160036.GC13267@adacore.com> References: <201007191537.20178.pedro@codesourcery.com> <83eifd7rv9.fsf@gnu.org> <20100719180117.GA25464@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100719180117.GA25464@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg00425.txt.bz2 > Joel, requesting approval for the 7.2 branch. > There is also less intrusive patch > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/gdb/F-13/gdb-bz594560-core-vs-process.patch?content-type=text%2Fplain&view=co > which does not remove the process_stratum. I am inclined hold off this patch off the branch (patch is too intrusive this late in the game, problem is too minor [IMO]). But Pedro has a better understanding of the patch, and if he thinks it's safe to put in, then that's good enough to go in 7.2. -- Joel