From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27658 invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2010 23:31:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 27649 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jul 2010 23:31:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:31:03 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6RNV1jf008543 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:31:01 -0400 Received: from mesquite.lan ([10.3.113.3]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6RNV1MW005164 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:31:01 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:31:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] remote-sim.c: Add support for multiple sim instances Message-ID: <20100727163101.6e493bdc@mesquite.lan> In-Reply-To: <201007280014.21018.pedro@codesourcery.com> References: <20100702153017.4381070b@mesquite.lan> <20100727160735.5d1fbfbb@mesquite.lan> <201007280014.21018.pedro@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg00458.txt.bz2 On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:14:20 +0100 Pedro Alves wrote: > On Wednesday 28 July 2010 00:07:35, Kevin Buettner wrote: > > Any other comments on this patch? > > > > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-07/msg00059.html > > I took a quick look at this the other day, and it looked generaly > a good idea, though I thought I saw a couple of things I'd like > to comment on. I'd like to take another look. Ping me again > if I don't come back to this in the next couple of days. Will do. Thanks for looking at it. Kevin