* [patch] Do not break while asking with -batch
@ 2010-07-23 17:06 Jan Kratochvil
2010-07-23 17:40 ` Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kratochvil @ 2010-07-23 17:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
Hi,
there was PR 9591 which originated from a request to safely `gdb_gcore.sh'
even from a very small terminal window.
FSF GDB HEAD currently still asks in such window
---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
and aborts.
OK to check-in?
No regressions on {x86_64,x86_64-m32,i686}-fedora13-linux-gnu.
Thanks,
Jan
gdb/
2010-07-23 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
* utils.c (prompt_for_continue): Return on BATCH_FLAG or not
INPUT_FROM_TERMINAL_P.
--- a/gdb/utils.c
+++ b/gdb/utils.c
@@ -2155,6 +2155,9 @@ prompt_for_continue (void)
char *ignore;
char cont_prompt[120];
+ if (batch_flag || ! input_from_terminal_p ())
+ return;
+
if (annotation_level > 1)
printf_unfiltered (("\n\032\032pre-prompt-for-continue\n"));
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] Do not break while asking with -batch
2010-07-23 17:06 [patch] Do not break while asking with -batch Jan Kratochvil
@ 2010-07-23 17:40 ` Tom Tromey
2010-07-23 18:09 ` Jan Kratochvil
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2010-07-23 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kratochvil; +Cc: gdb-patches
>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:
Jan> 2010-07-23 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Jan> * utils.c (prompt_for_continue): Return on BATCH_FLAG or not
Jan> INPUT_FROM_TERMINAL_P.
I think it would be reasonable to disable pagination if --batch or if
!input_from_terminal_p. Actually, I thought we already did this for
batch...
That would mean putting the check in fputs_maybe_filtered alongside all
the other ones.
What do you (& others) think?
Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] Do not break while asking with -batch
2010-07-23 17:40 ` Tom Tromey
@ 2010-07-23 18:09 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-07-23 22:41 ` Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kratochvil @ 2010-07-23 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Tromey; +Cc: gdb-patches
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 19:39:49 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote:
> I think it would be reasonable to disable pagination if --batch or if
> !input_from_terminal_p. Actually, I thought we already did this for
> batch...
>
> That would mean putting the check in fputs_maybe_filtered alongside all
> the other ones.
Or maybe this more radical patch?
No regressions on {x86_64,x86_64-m32,i686}-fedora13-linux-gnu.
Thanks,
Jan
2010-07-23 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
* top.c (input_from_terminal_p): Return 0 on BATCH_FLAG.
* utils.c (defaulted_query): Do not explicitly check for BATCH_FLAG.
(fputs_maybe_filtered): Do not do filtering also on
! INPUT_FROM_TERMINAL_P.
--- a/gdb/top.c
+++ b/gdb/top.c
@@ -1242,6 +1242,9 @@ input_from_terminal_p (void)
if (interactive_mode != AUTO_BOOLEAN_AUTO)
return interactive_mode == AUTO_BOOLEAN_TRUE;
+ if (batch_flag)
+ return 0;
+
if (gdb_has_a_terminal () && instream == stdin)
return 1;
--- a/gdb/utils.c
+++ b/gdb/utils.c
@@ -1634,7 +1634,7 @@ defaulted_query (const char *ctlstr, const char defchar, va_list args)
question we're asking, and then answer the default automatically. This
way, important error messages don't get lost when talking to GDB
over a pipe. */
- if (batch_flag || ! input_from_terminal_p ())
+ if (! input_from_terminal_p ())
{
wrap_here ("");
vfprintf_filtered (gdb_stdout, ctlstr, args);
@@ -2352,7 +2352,8 @@ fputs_maybe_filtered (const char *linebuffer, struct ui_file *stream,
/* Don't do any filtering if it is disabled. */
if (stream != gdb_stdout
- || !pagination_enabled
+ || ! pagination_enabled
+ || ! input_from_terminal_p ()
|| (lines_per_page == UINT_MAX && chars_per_line == UINT_MAX)
|| top_level_interpreter () == NULL
|| ui_out_is_mi_like_p (interp_ui_out (top_level_interpreter ())))
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] Do not break while asking with -batch
2010-07-23 18:09 ` Jan Kratochvil
@ 2010-07-23 22:41 ` Tom Tromey
2010-07-27 16:35 ` Joel Brobecker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2010-07-23 22:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kratochvil; +Cc: gdb-patches
>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:
Tom> I think it would be reasonable to disable pagination if --batch or if
Tom> !input_from_terminal_p. Actually, I thought we already did this for
Tom> batch...
From NEWS:
*** Changes in GDB 7.2
[...]
* The --batch flag now disables pagination and queries.
Apparently I missed the pagination part... oops.
Jan> 2010-07-23 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Jan> * top.c (input_from_terminal_p): Return 0 on BATCH_FLAG.
Jan> * utils.c (defaulted_query): Do not explicitly check for BATCH_FLAG.
Jan> (fputs_maybe_filtered): Do not do filtering also on
Jan> ! INPUT_FROM_TERMINAL_P.
Ok.
I think this should go in 7.2, as well, given the above NEWS entry.
Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] Do not break while asking with -batch
2010-07-23 22:41 ` Tom Tromey
@ 2010-07-27 16:35 ` Joel Brobecker
2010-07-27 19:17 ` Jan Kratochvil
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2010-07-27 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Tromey; +Cc: Jan Kratochvil, gdb-patches
> I think this should go in 7.2, as well, given the above NEWS entry.
Agreed on both counts (more radical version, and branch).
--
Joel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] Do not break while asking with -batch
2010-07-27 16:35 ` Joel Brobecker
@ 2010-07-27 19:17 ` Jan Kratochvil
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kratochvil @ 2010-07-27 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: Tom Tromey, gdb-patches
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:34:54 +0200, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> Agreed on both counts (more radical version, and branch).
Checked-in HEAD:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2010-07/msg00165.html
Checked-in 7.2:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2010-07/msg00166.html
Thanks,
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-07-27 19:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-07-23 17:06 [patch] Do not break while asking with -batch Jan Kratochvil
2010-07-23 17:40 ` Tom Tromey
2010-07-23 18:09 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-07-23 22:41 ` Tom Tromey
2010-07-27 16:35 ` Joel Brobecker
2010-07-27 19:17 ` Jan Kratochvil
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).