From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19719 invoked by alias); 28 Jul 2010 20:02:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 19670 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jul 2010 20:02:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:02:25 +0000 Received: from int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.18]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6SK2OLD024151 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:02:24 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com ([10.3.112.10]) by int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6SK2MW1012296 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:02:23 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (greed.delorie.com [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by greed.delorie.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o6SK2MZD007531 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:02:22 -0400 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o6SK2MhS007528; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:02:22 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:02:00 -0000 Message-Id: <201007282002.o6SK2MhS007528@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20100727221503.59032690@mesquite.lan> (message from Kevin Buettner on Tue, 27 Jul 2010 22:15:03 -0700) Subject: Maintainers [was Re: [rx-sim]: add cycle accuracy] References: <201007280206.o6S26g5e013725@greed.delorie.com> <20100727221503.59032690@mesquite.lan> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg00515.txt.bz2 > DJ Delorie wrote: > > There doesn't seem to be an rx-specific sim maintainer. Since I wrote > > it, should I be the maintainer? Kevin replied: > Yes, I think you should be the maintainer for the rx sim. Tom replied: > IMO, yes. Does the SC need to make the final decision on this?