From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1147 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2010 21:38:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 1139 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jul 2010 21:38:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:38:32 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA4EA2BAB5E; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:38:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 5zxuqKvR9iYh; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:38:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C0132BAB41; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:38:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0C9655BE20; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:38:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:38:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Tom Tromey Cc: Jan Kratochvil , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] Fix regression on prelinked executables Message-ID: <20100729213823.GF13267@adacore.com> References: <20100715095457.GA22922@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20100729163648.GA13267@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg00561.txt.bz2 > This is fine by me -- but AFAIK Darwin is pretty broken already. At > least, there is an open bug with what looks to be a simple crasher. I wasn't aware of that. As far as we can tell, it's working fine at AdaCore. One of the issues is that neither Tristan nor myself monitor the open bugs in bugzilla. If something like this gets reported, I think it's work sending Tristan a note. Regarding the patch - if a second GM thinks it's safe for 7.2, then that's also good enough for me. -- Joel