From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26163 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2010 10:14:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 26153 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Aug 2010 10:14:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:14:10 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA232BAB5B; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 06:14:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id rjTP+2OMPlJk; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 06:14:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138882BAAFE; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 06:14:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2ADC0F59AC; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:14:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:14:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Tom Tromey Cc: Kazu Hirata , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Your INTERMEDIATE_ENCODING patch for Solaris Message-ID: <20100818101406.GA2903@adacore.com> References: <20100731162500.32FAE5664F4@henry1.codesourcery.com> <20100817184407.GC3599@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00288.txt.bz2 > I think that without this patch, a Solaris build (without libiconv) is > just pretty broken. I think even `print "string"' should fail. I'm a little confused at the moment. `print "string"' works and I get only PASSes with one UNTESTED due to the fact that we only have 2 charsets available. Would it be because I have not configure GDB in a way that reproduces the problem? And then I did something that will bring the wrath of the NY sysadmin team because I ran the entire testsuite, which I forgot brings the machine down. So I cannot say more about the general results :-(. -- Joel