From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11653 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2010 14:52:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 11638 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Aug 2010 14:52:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:52:22 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB2C2BAB7F; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:52:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id VQN2whLoK-sA; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:52:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1145C2BAB7E; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:52:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0409CF59AC; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:52:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:52:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pierre Muller Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Your INTERMEDIATE_ENCODING patch for Solaris Message-ID: <20100818145218.GB2903@adacore.com> References: <20100731162500.32FAE5664F4@henry1.codesourcery.com> <20100817184407.GC3599@adacore.com> <20100818101406.GA2903@adacore.com> <000001cb3ee3$bbbaf040$3330d0c0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000001cb3ee3$bbbaf040$3330d0c0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00297.txt.bz2 IMO, investing too much energy into making GDB work with a "difficult" (aka broken) libiconv is a waste of precious time. Perhaps it's time for us to cut the losses and decide that building GDB requires GNU libiconv. I was first in line asking that GDB could be built without GNU libiconv, but I can see from experience how much of a mess that is... ? -- Joel