public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
To: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [Patch,ARM] Next pc of sigreturn/rt_sigreturn syscall
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:31:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100825143137.GG28036@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100825030554.GC29794@codesourcery.com>

Generally looks OK.

On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:05:55PM -0700, Yao Qi wrote:
> Here is the updated patch, in which:
>   1.  Add arm_linux_syscall_next_pc, similar to
> mips_linux_syscall_next_pc.  Compute the return address of SWI in both
> ARM mode and Thumb mode.
>   2.  Extract some common code from arm_linux_copy_svc.

A valid return address won't be zero, but it's still confusing.
Please do this the way that e.g. mips_linux_get_longjmp_target does;
return 0 or 1, and have a CORE_ADDR * parameter.

> +static int
> +arm_linux_sigreturn_return_addr(struct frame_info *frame,
> +				unsigned long svc_number)

Space before "(".  Same problem in other places, too.

> +/* When FRAME is at a syscall instruction, return the PC of the next
> +   instruction to be executed.  */
> +
> +static CORE_ADDR
> +arm_linux_syscall_next_pc (struct frame_info *frame)
> +{
> +  CORE_ADDR pc = get_frame_pc (frame);
> +  CORE_ADDR return_addr = 0;
> +  return_addr = arm_linux_sigreturn_return_addr(frame,
> +						get_frame_register_unsigned (frame, 7));

Line too long; move the read of r7 to another temporary.

What about non-EABI?  We shouldn't wire this up for non-EABI binaries,
because the syscall number won't be in r7.

> @@ -2808,7 +2808,16 @@ thumb_get_next_pc_raw (struct frame_info *frame, CORE_ADDR pc, int insert_bkpt)
>    else if ((inst1 & 0xf000) == 0xd000)	/* conditional branch */
>      {
>        unsigned long cond = bits (inst1, 8, 11);
> -      if (cond != 0x0f && condition_true (cond, status))    /* 0x0f = SWI */
> +      if (cond == 0x0f)  /* 0x0f = SWI */

Why did you remove the condition_true check?

> +	{
> +	  struct gdbarch_tdep *tdep;
> +	  tdep = gdbarch_tdep (get_frame_arch (frame));

You can just use gdbarch_tdep (gdbarch).

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-25 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-24  6:39 Yao Qi
2010-08-24 11:28 ` Mark Kettenis
2010-08-24 14:13   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2010-08-25  3:06     ` Yao Qi
2010-08-25 14:31       ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2010-08-26  8:51         ` Yao Qi
2010-08-30 13:00           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2010-08-30 13:08             ` Mark Kettenis
2010-08-30 15:35               ` Yao Qi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100825143137.GG28036@caradoc.them.org \
    --to=dan@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=yao@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).