From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-75223-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 24310 invoked by alias); 30 Aug 2010 11:11:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 24300 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Aug 2010 11:11:29 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:11:24 +0000
Received: from glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1])	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o7UBB22N015984;	Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:11:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost)	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o7UBB0c8030327;	Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:11:00 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:11:00 -0000
Message-Id: <201008301111.o7UBB0c8030327@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: eliz@gnu.org
CC: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <E1Oq1II-0003mN-Gh@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii	on Mon, 30 Aug 2010 06:08:50 -0400)
Subject: Re: [patch 1/9]#2 Rename `enum target_signal' to target_signal_t
References: <20100830071040.GB6831@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <201008300814.o7U8ECNZ009010@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20100830082407.GA6881@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <E1Oq1II-0003mN-Gh@fencepost.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00505.txt.bz2

> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 06:08:50 -0400
> 
> > Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:24:07 +0200
> > From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> > 
> > On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:14:12 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > The _t suffix is actually reserved by POSIX, so using it is actually a
> > > bad idea.  Perhaps change it to gdb_target_signal, or just
> > > target_signal (making it a typedef for an anonymous enum)?
> > 
> > I see too many types in GDB and everywhere ending with _t (ptid_t for all).
> 
> Right, and I didn't know it was reserved.  Mark, could you please
> point to the Posix document (hopefully, freely accessible) which says
> that?  TIA

http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/xsh_chap02_02.html

The _t suffix is listed on the last row of the first table on that page.

Cheers,

Mark