From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16469 invoked by alias); 31 Aug 2010 18:16:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 16459 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Aug 2010 18:16:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_CP,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 18:16:52 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7VIGp4T012392 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:16:51 -0400 Received: from host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7VIGnav004675 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:16:50 -0400 Received: from host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o7VIGmed015931; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:16:48 +0200 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o7VIGmas015930; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:16:48 +0200 Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 18:16:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: cancel: Re: [patch 5/9]#2 Move siginfo_fixup linux-nat -> inf-ptrace Message-ID: <20100831181648.GC10352@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <20100830071312.GF6831@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <201008301144.o7UBiHr9023794@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201008301144.o7UBiHr9023794@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00560.txt.bz2 Hi, cancelling now this patch as being just a pre-requisite for: cancel: Re: [rfc 7/9]#2 Associate siginfo_t with any signal http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-08/msg00545.html On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:44:17 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > but my gut feeling is that the siginfo > processing is (at least for now) a Linux-specific feature and > therefore belongs in linux-nat.c. I see now that the siginfo corruption is more a bug in linux-nat.c only than a general GDB bug. > * The memcpy that's being done requires the size of "struct siginfo" > to be known. I'm not sure all platforms that use ptrace(2) actually > have a "struct siginfo" (OpenBSD, HP-UX 10.20 and Linux have it). > I'm not sure is enough to actually make the definition > available (have some doubts here for HP-UX 10.20). There was that HAVE_SIGINFO_T for it but it is offtopic now. Thanks, Jan