From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3237 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2010 17:17:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 3228 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Sep 2010 17:17:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 17:17:17 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA892BAC5F; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 13:17:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id NdzKoNpOc1qw; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 13:17:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E813E2BAC5D; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 13:17:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2FFA4F599F; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 19:17:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 17:17:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: sami wagiaalla Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Regression for gdb.stabs/gdb11479.exp [Re: [patch 1/2] Use custom hash function with bcache] Message-ID: <20100901171707.GZ2986@adacore.com> References: <4C6946E1.6000709@redhat.com> <4C6D5C83.3050602@redhat.com> <4C756132.5050301@redhat.com> <20100901082539.GA24609@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20100901161952.GX2986@adacore.com> <20100901164716.GY2986@adacore.com> <4C7E877D.7020308@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C7E877D.7020308@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-09/txt/msg00028.txt.bz2 > Agreed. I apologize for the breakage. I am working on this and will > try to fix it ASAP. I will also look to try to figure out why I > missed this in my testing. I wouldn't worry about having missed this: stabs is hardly every used and certainly not by default, and I know that we're still behind submitting debug-info-generation patches for Ada in GCC. So I know that it is difficult for anyone outside of AdaCore to really run the gdb.ada testcases. My worry is that we might have 2 distinct issues. I don't see yet how breakage with stabs and Ada can be related... -- Joel