On Thursday, September 30, 2010 8:56:34 pm Joel Brobecker wrote:
> Would you mind if we treated this as a separate patch, on top of
> the current patch? I'd also like to add a test that verifies this,
> hopefully not involving vector types.

The attached patch prevents the pre-/post- in-/decrement operators from 
returning  lvalues.  The following gdb command for example should not assign a 
value to the result of the post increment operation but throw an error:
  print i++ = 3;
I've added a few tests to the testsuite. Please let me know if there is a 
better place to put them.
Tested on i686-*-linux-gnu with no regressions. OK to apply?

Thanks
-ken