From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3719 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2010 16:11:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 3711 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Nov 2010 16:11:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:11:28 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C0F2BAC32; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 11:11:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id b9NPUfYMZzB9; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 11:11:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCEEB2BAC30; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 11:11:25 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1318D145907; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 08:11:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:11:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Eli Zaretskii , dje@google.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, ken@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tromey@redhat.com, pedro@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: [doc RFA] Switch to GCC coding style [Re: [patch] initial OpenCL C language support] Message-ID: <20101108161121.GA2933@adacore.com> References: <201010221920.30046.ken@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20101026195747.GE2847@adacore.com> <20101027190417.GA19067@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <201010272020.51386.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20101102165134.GA19296@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20101102172246.GA22137@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <8339rj5y7z.fsf@gnu.org> <20101108124942.GA29408@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101108124942.GA29408@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg00116.txt.bz2 > Yes, it would be better. But I am not going to spend the time on it myself. As a first step, I don't mind duplicating the GCC Conventions Wiki page onto ours, and then removing all the GCC-specific parts. I just want to make sure that we're all happy to go that way. > > To say nothing of the fact that they will now have to read two documents > > instead of 1. > > 3 instead of 2 (besides GNU Coding Standards and gdbint.texinfo Coding > Standards proposing also GCC Coding Conventions). I agree that 1 document would be better, even if we end up duplicating some information in GCS. It's just simpler for everyone. -- Joel