From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12139 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2011 13:36:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 11826 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Mar 2011 13:36:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:36:44 +0000 Received: (qmail 1118 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2011 13:36:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO caradoc.them.org) (dan@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 21 Mar 2011 13:36:42 -0000 Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:51:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, rearnsha@arm.com, matthew.gretton-dann@arm.com Subject: Re: [rfc/rfa] Use ARM exception tables as GDB unwinder Message-ID: <20110321133639.GM16992@caradoc.them.org> References: <20110311221709.GZ25422@caradoc.them.org> <201103182301.p2IN14UZ023420@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201103182301.p2IN14UZ023420@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00952.txt.bz2 On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 12:01:04AM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > After some back and forth, I've been able to come up with a solution > that works well enough for all GDB tests to pass. It is not completely > perfect since unwinding (on the parent side) out of an interrupted vfork > call works only while the child has not yet clobbered the stack, but I > don't see how to do anything better ... > > Patch is appended below. Does this look reasonable to you? Yes, this does. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Mentor Graphics