From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, pedro@codesourcery.com
Subject: Code formatting [Re: [patch] s390*: watchpoints regression [repost]]
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:38:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111218115931.GA22952@host2.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1RcF43-00081B-PK@fencepost.gnu.org> <20111218104634.GJ21915@adacore.com>
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 11:46:34 +0100, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> Regarding the extra curly braces, I think it's OK to leave them out,
> like so:
>
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:37:59 +0100, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > It then requires new { brackets }
>
> I don't think you need braces. The compiler certainly doesn't.
While this is bikeshedding in its purest form I can jump in.
> if ([...])
> /* This is a comment that ... */
> return;
This is a bug from the first sight as there are two C statements attached to
an `if' conditional. Two statements always need a block. This is a bug.
I really do not have time to interrupt myself each time, several times
a minute, looking at the code starting examining what those two statements
semantically are, and therefore if they really require a block or not.
Thanks,
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-18 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-17 12:22 [obv] s390*: Fix build regression, remains execution regression Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-17 12:33 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-17 19:37 ` [patch] s390*: watchpoints regression [Re: [obv] s390*: Fix build regression] Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-17 19:44 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-17 19:45 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-17 19:56 ` [patch] s390*: watchpoints regression [repost] Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-17 20:13 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-17 20:35 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-17 21:08 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-18 6:37 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-12-18 10:11 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-18 11:38 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-12-18 12:38 ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2011-12-18 15:50 ` Code formatting [Re: [patch] s390*: watchpoints regression [repost]] Mark Kettenis
2011-12-18 17:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-12-18 17:57 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-18 18:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-12-20 14:29 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-18 11:42 ` [patch] s390*: watchpoints regression [repost] Eli Zaretskii
2011-12-19 21:37 ` Ulrich Weigand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111218115931.GA22952@host2.jankratochvil.net \
--to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).