From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15269 invoked by alias); 15 Aug 2013 17:43:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 15254 invoked by uid 89); 15 Aug 2013 17:43:39 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-50.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org (HELO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org) (204.13.248.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 17:43:31 +0000 Received: from pool-173-48-46-190.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([173.48.46.190] helo=cgf.cx) by mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VA1a5-0006lm-5K; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 17:43:29 +0000 Received: from localhost (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA3E060117; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 13:43:27 -0400 (EDT) X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX19pCcGulMG2zg91zD8fTmab Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 17:43:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Yao Qi , Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 V4] Test mingw32 GDB in cygwin Message-ID: <20130815174327.GC6955@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Yao Qi , Eli Zaretskii References: <1376386468-26249-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <83fvudpom7.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83fvudpom7.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00402.txt.bz2 On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 07:00:32PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Yao Qi >> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 17:34:25 +0800 >> >> Here is the V4 of this patch series, which fix problems we've seen on >> running mingw32 native for testing cygwin. V3 was reviewed in this thread >> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2013-07/msg00691.html by Eli mostly. >> All the questions/comments were addressed, AFAIK. However, no one >> approved it explicitly. I post them again, and call it V4, which is >> identical to patches I finally posted in V3 thread. It is sort of a >> patch ping. > >I suggest to commit this, based on my review, if no one objects in a >few days. I'll just register my objection to gdb using undocumented cygwin internal data representations one more time. I think that just making pipes unbuffered or using an environment variable or command-line option is better way to handle this than assuming that we won't be changing something in Cygwin. cgf