From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-109079-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 29490 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2014 14:53:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 29368 invoked by uid 89); 10 Jan 2014 14:53:37 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 14:53:37 +0000
Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0AErW3j001069	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:53:32 -0500
Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-16.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.16])	by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s0AErSW9028224	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);	Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:53:30 -0500
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 14:53:00 -0000
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,        Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>,        Andreas Krebbel <krebbel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix possible alignment issue with dw2-dir-file-name test case
Message-ID: <20140110145327.GA23695@host2.jankratochvil.net>
References: <87a9f65p73.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> <52CFD97A.4040009@redhat.com> <87mwj352p5.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87mwj352p5.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00281.txt.bz2

On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:30:46 +0100, Andreas Arnez wrote:
> It's certainly simpler.  Maybe Jan can explain why the functions had
> been declared static?
> 
> Your patch fixes the FAILs for me, so if there's no reason for the
> static-ness, then I agree we should go with that.

The Pedro's patch should be OK, there is nothing magic there.


Thanks,
Jan