Re: [PING^2] [RFC 00/23] Regset rework preparations

[Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>]

> From: Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 14:13:26 +0200
> 
> Although there was feedback for some of the patches in this series
> (https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-04/msg00560.html), many are
> still uncommented.  I'd really appreciate more feedback, particularly
> for the architecture-specific changes.

Sorry, I've not been able to find time to process your reply on my
review of patch 12 yet and won't be able to for the next 1.5 weeks or
so.  But perhaps you could move ahead with the diffs that don't depend
on that one which seem useful in their own right.

> Patches 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 (AARCH64, ARM, MIPS, MN10300, and SCORE): No
> comments yet.
> 
> > * Patch 9 ("SPARC: Rename register maps from "*regset" to "*regmap"):
> >   Adjusts naming, to avoid name clashes in patch 10.
> 
> Approved by Mark Kettenis:
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-05/msg00038.html

I don't really expect any response for MN10300 and SCORE.  I'd give it
a few days to give people with an interest in ARM and MIPS the
opportunity to repsond, but feel free to move ahead with 3, 4, 6, 7
and 8 after that.