From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20101 invoked by alias); 4 Jun 2014 13:36:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 20092 invoked by uid 89); 4 Jun 2014 13:36:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 13:36:12 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s54Da5ON005252 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 4 Jun 2014 09:36:06 -0400 Received: from blade.nx (ovpn-116-110.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.110]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s54Da3GA030910; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 09:36:04 -0400 Received: by blade.nx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1B74926243D; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 14:36:03 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 13:36:00 -0000 From: Gary Benson To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, aburgess@broadcom.com, xdje42@gmail.com, fw@deneb.enyo.de, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, palves@redhat.com, tromey@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v3] Demangler crash handler Message-ID: <20140604133603.GC10121@blade.nx> References: <20140604100755.GA7570@blade.nx> <20140604100957.GC7570@blade.nx> <834n017z8w.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <834n017z8w.fsf@gnu.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg00161.txt.bz2 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Gary Benson > > > > Eli pointed out that SIGSEGV is an ANSI-standard signal but I > > found various other SIGSEGV checks in GDB > > They should all be removed. Ok, I'll do this. Should I commit the change as obvious? Thanks, Gary -- http://gbenson.net/