From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8279 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2014 12:55:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 8260 invoked by uid 89); 5 Jun 2014 12:55:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 12:55:57 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EFDC116144; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 08:55:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id nRzkmN9e9pxP; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 08:55:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E92C1160ED; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 08:55:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B6AAE40EB2; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 05:55:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 12:55:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, Alan Modra , Hans-Peter Nilsson Subject: Re: [RFA v2] Make it easy to make --disable-werror the default for both binutils and gdb Message-ID: <20140605125557.GC4289@adacore.com> References: <1401811030-22706-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <87tx808k6j.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87tx808k6j.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg00250.txt.bz2 Thanks, Alan and Tom. I just pushed the patch to master. Regarding the "-a" vs "&&", I am happy making the change, if you would like me to. It seems from the text quoted by Maciej that "&&" might be more portable, but since we've been using "-a" without issue (to my knowledge) I am tempted to wait until a portability issue actually shows up. The workaround in case of problem is fairly easy - use another shell like bash, for instance. -- Joel