public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Keven Boell <keven.boell@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Keven Boell <keven.boell@intel.com>,
	gdb-patches@sourceware.org,	sanimir.agovic@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/23] dwarf: add dwarf3 DW_OP_push_object_address opcode
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 13:08:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140611130815.GC4709@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53984AE9.7020200@linux.intel.com>

> The address fields were introduced as DW_OP_push_object_address
> needs an object address to be pushed and this address needs to be stored
> somewhere. However, I will extend the log message why this address fields
> were introduced.

I understand this part, but the main part of my question is about
the fact that, most of the time, we manipulate "struct value" objects,
which may not represent addressable entities. For instance, let's say
I have a struct value whose type is a TYPE_CODE_ARRAY. If I need to
resolve the value's type, how should I be doing it? Perhaps, the
question in itself suggest the introduction of a function that would
take a value, and returned a value whose time is resolved?

-- 
Joel

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-11 13:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-04  5:54 [PATCH 00/23] Fortran dynamic array support Keven Boell
2014-06-04  5:54 ` [PATCH 16/23] test: correct ptype of dynamic arrays in Fortran Keven Boell
2014-06-04  5:54 ` [PATCH 08/23] vla: get dynamic array corner cases to work Keven Boell
2014-06-04  5:54 ` [PATCH 13/23] test: evaluate Fortran dynamic arrays of types Keven Boell
2014-06-16 20:57   ` Jan Kratochvil
2014-06-04  5:54 ` [PATCH 07/23] vla: use value constructor instead of raw-buffer manipulation Keven Boell
2014-06-04  5:54 ` [PATCH 12/23] test: basic tests for dynamic array evaluations in Fortran Keven Boell
2014-06-04  5:54 ` [PATCH 11/23] vla: add stride support to fortran arrays Keven Boell
2014-06-04  5:54 ` [PATCH 23/23] test: stride support for dynamic arrays Keven Boell
2014-06-04  5:54 ` [PATCH 15/23] test: dynamic arrays passed to subroutines Keven Boell
2014-06-04  5:54 ` [PATCH 14/23] test: evaluate dynamic arrays using Fortran primitives Keven Boell
2014-06-04  5:54 ` [PATCH 03/23] vla: introduce allocated/associated flags Keven Boell
2014-06-04  5:54 ` [PATCH 06/23] vla: reconstruct value to compute bounds of target type Keven Boell
2014-06-04  5:54 ` [PATCH 10/23] vla: get Fortran dynamic strings working Keven Boell
2014-06-04  5:54 ` [PATCH 05/23] vla: make field selection work with vla Keven Boell
2014-06-04  5:54 ` [PATCH 20/23] test: dynamic string evaluations Keven Boell
2014-06-16 18:41   ` Jan Kratochvil
2014-06-17 13:52     ` Keven Boell
2014-06-04  5:54 ` [PATCH 04/23] vla: make dynamic fortran arrays functional Keven Boell
2014-06-16 21:02   ` Jan Kratochvil
2014-06-17 13:53     ` Keven Boell
2014-06-17 17:26       ` Jan Kratochvil
2014-06-04  5:55 ` [PATCH 02/23] dwarf: add DW_AT_data_location support Keven Boell
2014-06-10 12:10   ` Joel Brobecker
2014-06-11 12:29     ` Keven Boell
2014-06-14 13:21     ` Jan Kratochvil
2014-06-04  5:55 ` [PATCH 22/23] test: test sizeof for dynamic fortran arrays Keven Boell
2014-06-04  5:55 ` [PATCH 21/23] test: basic MI test for the dynamic array support Keven Boell
2014-06-04  5:55 ` [PATCH 19/23] test: accessing dynamic array history values Keven Boell
2014-06-04  5:55 ` [PATCH 01/23] dwarf: add dwarf3 DW_OP_push_object_address opcode Keven Boell
2014-06-05 20:47   ` Tom Tromey
2014-06-11 12:30     ` Keven Boell
2014-06-10  9:54   ` Joel Brobecker
2014-06-11 12:26     ` Keven Boell
2014-06-11 13:08       ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2014-06-12  7:57         ` Keven Boell
2014-06-12 15:47           ` Joel Brobecker
2014-06-17 13:52             ` Keven Boell
2014-06-21 15:21               ` Joel Brobecker
2014-07-07 15:29                 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-06-04  5:55 ` [PATCH 17/23] test: evaluating allocation/association status Keven Boell
2014-06-04  5:55 ` [PATCH 18/23] test: dynamic arrays passed to functions Keven Boell
2014-06-04  5:55 ` [PATCH 09/23] vla: changed string length semantic Keven Boell
2014-06-04  7:10 ` [PATCH 00/23] Fortran dynamic array support Eli Zaretskii
2014-06-04 12:50 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-06-14 18:57 ` Jan Kratochvil
2014-06-14 19:39   ` Jan Kratochvil
2014-06-17 13:54     ` Keven Boell
2014-06-17 17:20       ` Jan Kratochvil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140611130815.GC4709@adacore.com \
    --to=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=keven.boell@intel.com \
    --cc=keven.boell@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=sanimir.agovic@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).